Reverse of left ventricular remodeling in heart failure patients with left bundle branch area pacing: Systematic review and meta‐analysis.

Background: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has recently become a promising option for the near‐natural restoration of electrical activation. However, the clinical relevance of therapeutic effects in individuals with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and dyssynchrony remain...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Pacing & Clinical Electrophysiology Vol. 46; no. 6; pp. 459 - 467
Autores principales: Siranart, Noppachai, Chokesuwattanaskul, Ronpichai, Prasitlumkum, Narut, Huntrakul, Anurut, Phanthong, Tanattida, Sowalertrat, Walit, Navaravong, Leenhapong, Cheungpasitporn, Wisit, Jongnarangsin, Krit
Formato: meta analysis research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Jun2023
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=164230619&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 164230619
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01478389
        4F8
      jtl: Pacing & Clinical Electrophysiology
      issn: 01478389
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2023
      vid: 46
      iid: 6
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        164230619
        161542362
        164230619
        164230619
        10.1111/pace.14661
        164230619
      ppf: 459
      ppct: 8
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Reverse of left ventricular remodeling in heart failure patients with left bundle branch area pacing: Systematic review and meta‐analysis.
      aug:
        au:
          Siranart, Noppachai
          Chokesuwattanaskul, Ronpichai
          Prasitlumkum, Narut
          Huntrakul, Anurut
          Phanthong, Tanattida
          Sowalertrat, Walit
          Navaravong, Leenhapong
          Cheungpasitporn, Wisit
          Jongnarangsin, Krit
        affil: Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
      sug:
        subj:
          Heart Failure
          Bundle-Branch Block
          Ventricular Remodeling
          Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
          Cardiac Pacing, Artificial
          Treatment Outcomes
          Human
          Systematic Review
          Meta Analysis
          Medline
          Embase
          Cochrane Library
          Ventricular Ejection Fraction
          Confidence Intervals
      ab: Background: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has recently become a promising option for the near‐natural restoration of electrical activation. However, the clinical relevance of therapeutic effects in individuals with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and dyssynchrony remains unknown. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception until June 2022. Data from each study was combined using a random‐effects model, the generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird, to calculate standard mean differences and pooled incidence ratio, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: A total of 772 HFrEF patients were analyzed from 15 observational studies per protocol. The success rate of LBBAP implantation was 94.8% (95% CI 89.9–99.6, I2 = 79.4%), which was strongly correlated with shortening QRS duration after LBBAP implantation, with a mean difference of −48.10 ms (95% CI −60.16 to −36.05, I2 = 96.7%). Over a period of 6–12 months of follow‐up, pacing parameters were stable over time. There were significant improvements in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end‐systolic volume (LVESV), left ventricular end‐diastolic diameter (LVEDD), and left ventricular end‐diastolic volume (LVEDV) with mean difference of 16.38% (95% CI 13.13–19.63, I2 = 90.2%), −46.23 ml (95% CI −63.17 to −29.29, I2 = 86.82%), −7.21 mm (95% CI −9.71 to −4.71, I2 = 84.6%), and −44.52 ml (95% CI −64.40 to −24.64, I2 = 85.9%), respectively. Conclusions: LBBAP was associated with improvements in both cardiac function and electrical synchrony. The benefits of LBBAP in individuals with HFrEF and dyssynchrony should be further validated by randomized studies.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        meta analysis
        research
        systematic review
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N