The division of cognitive labor and the structure of interdisciplinary problems.

Interdisciplinarity is strongly promoted in science policy across the world. It is seen as a necessary condition for providing practical solutions to many pressing complex problems for which no single disciplinary approach is adequate alone. In this article we model multi- and interdisciplinary rese...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Synthese Vol. 201; no. 6; pp. 1 - 21
Autores principales: Reijula, Samuli, Kuorikoski, Jaakko, MacLeod, Miles
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Jun2023
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=164236992&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 164236992
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00397857
        4LI
      jtl: Synthese
      issn: 00397857
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2023
      vid: 201
      iid: 6
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        164236992
        10.1007/s11229-023-04193-4
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 20
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 774KB
      tig:
        atl: The division of cognitive labor and the structure of interdisciplinary problems.
      aug:
        au:
          Reijula, Samuli
          Kuorikoski, Jaakko
          MacLeod, Miles
        affil:
          Theoretical Philosophy, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
          Practical Philosophy, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
          Philosophy Section, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
      sug:
      keyword:
        Collective problem solving
        Division of cognitive labor
        Interdisciplinarity
        Modularity
      ab: Interdisciplinarity is strongly promoted in science policy across the world. It is seen as a necessary condition for providing practical solutions to many pressing complex problems for which no single disciplinary approach is adequate alone. In this article we model multi- and interdisciplinary research as an instance of collective problem solving. Our goal is to provide a basic representation of this type of problem solving and chart the epistemic benefits and costs of researchers engaging in different forms of cognitive coordination. Our findings suggest that typical forms of interdisciplinary collaboration are unlikely to find optimal solutions to complex problems within short time frames and can lead to methodological conservatism. This provides some grounds for both reflecting on current science policy and envisioning more effective scientific practices with respect to interdisciplinary problem solving.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Synthese is a copyright of Springer, 2023. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Synthese
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2023
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N