Branching actualism and cosmological arguments.

We draw out significant consequences of a relatively popular theory of metaphysical modality—branching actualism—for cosmological arguments for God's existence. According to branching actualism, every possible world shares an initial history with the actual world and diverges only because causal pow...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophical Studies Vol. 180; no. 7; pp. 1951 - 1974
Autores principales: Schmid, Joseph C., Malpass, Alex
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Jul2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=164372081&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 164372081
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00318116
        4L8
      jtl: Philosophical Studies
      issn: 00318116
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul2023
      vid: 180
      iid: 7
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        164372081
        10.1007/s11098-023-01958-y
      ppf: 1951
      ppct: 23
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 769KB
      tig:
        atl: Branching actualism and cosmological arguments.
      aug:
        au:
          Schmid, Joseph C.
          Malpass, Alex
        affil:
          Purdue University, 610 Purdue Mall, 47907, West Lafayette, IN, USA
          Bristol, UK
      su:
        Metaphysics
        Plausibility (Logic)
        Dialects
        Modality (Theory of knowledge)
        Semantics
      sug:
        subj:
          Metaphysics
          Plausibility (Logic)
          Dialects
          Modality (Theory of knowledge)
          Semantics
      keyword:
        Branching actualism
        Contingency arguments
        Cosmological arguments
        Kalam
        Modality
      ab: We draw out significant consequences of a relatively popular theory of metaphysical modality—branching actualism—for cosmological arguments for God's existence. According to branching actualism, every possible world shares an initial history with the actual world and diverges only because causal powers (or dispositions, or some such) are differentially exercised. We argue that branching actualism undergirds successful responses to two recent cosmological arguments: the Grim Reaper Kalam argument and a modal argument from contingency. We also argue that branching actualism affords a response to one popular defense of the classic contingency argument. What results are new difficulties for several cosmological arguments arising from the metaphysics of modality.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Philosophical Studies is a copyright of Springer, 2023. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Philosophical Studies
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2023
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N