Open Science Practices in Communication Sciences and Disorders: A Survey.

Purpose: Open science is a collection of practices that seek to improve the accessibility, transparency, and replicability of science. Although these practices have garnered interest in related fields, it remains unclear whether open science practices have been adopted in the field of communication...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research Vol. 66; no. 6; pp. 1928 - 1948
Autores principales: El Amin, Mariam, Borders, James C., Long, Helen L., Keller, Mary Alice, Kearney, Elaine
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Jun2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=164422015&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 164422015
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10924388
        1SM
      jtl: Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research
      issn: 10924388
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2023
      vid: 66
      iid: 6
      pid: 42
      pub: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
    artinfo:
      ui:
        164422015
        10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00062
      ppf: 1928
      ppct: 20
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 2.7MB
      tig:
        atl: Open Science Practices in Communication Sciences and Disorders: A Survey.
      aug:
        au:
          El Amin, Mariam
          Borders, James C.
          Long, Helen L.
          Keller, Mary Alice
          Kearney, Elaine
        affil:
          Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Georgia, Athens.
          Department of Biobehavioral Sciences, Teacher College, Columbia University, New York, NY.
          Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin–Madison.
          HCA Healthcare, Nashville, TN.
          Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, Boston University, MA.
      su:
        United States
        Communicative disorders
        Human services programs
        Learning
        Communication
        Students
        Regression analysis
        Surveys
        Descriptive statistics
        Hypothesis
        Scale analysis (Psychology)
        Chi-squared test
        Thematic analysis
      sug:
        subj:
          Communicative disorders
          Human services programs
          Learning
          Communication
          Students
          United States
          Regression analysis
          Surveys
          Descriptive statistics
          Hypothesis
          Scale analysis (Psychology)
          Chi-squared test
          Thematic analysis
      ab: Purpose: Open science is a collection of practices that seek to improve the accessibility, transparency, and replicability of science. Although these practices have garnered interest in related fields, it remains unclear whether open science practices have been adopted in the field of communication sciences and disorders (CSD). This study aimed to survey the knowledge, implementation, and perceived benefits and barriers of open science practices in CSD. Method: An online survey was disseminated to researchers in the United States actively engaged in CSD research. Four-core open science practices were examined: preregistration, self-archiving, gold open access, and open data. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and regression models. Results: Two hundred twenty-two participants met the inclusion criteria. Most participants were doctoral students (38%) or assistant professors (24%) at R1 institutions (58%). Participants reported low knowledge of preregistration and gold open access. There was, however, a high level of desire to learn more for all practices. Implementation of open science practices was also low, most notably for preregistration, gold open access, and open data (< 25%). Predictors of knowledge and participation, as well as perceived barriers to implementation, are discussed. Conclusion: Although participation in open science appears low in the field of CSD, participants expressed a strong desire to learn more in order to engage in these practices in the future.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N