The Effect of Open Access on Scholarly and Societal Metrics of Impact in the ASHA Journals.
Purpose: This study examined the effect of open access (OA) status on scholarly and societal metrics of impact (citation counts and altmetric scores, respectively) across manuscripts published in the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) Journals. Method: Three thousand four hundred ni...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research Vol. 66; no. 6; pp. 1948 - 1958 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
Jun2023
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=164422016&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 164422016 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 10924388 1SM jtl: Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research issn: 10924388 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jun2023 vid: 66 iid: 6 pid: 42 pub: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association artinfo: ui: 164422016 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00315 ppf: 1948 ppct: 10 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 597KB tig: atl: The Effect of Open Access on Scholarly and Societal Metrics of Impact in the ASHA Journals. aug: au: Long, Helen L. Drown, Lee Amin, Mariam El affil: Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin–Madison. University of Connecticut, Storrs. University of Georgia, Athens. su: United States American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Associations, institutions, etc. Publishing Motivation (Psychology) Manuscripts Scholarly communication Benchmarking (Management) Comparative studies Open access publishing Descriptive statistics Research funding Newsletters sug: subj: Associations, institutions, etc. Publishing Motivation (Psychology) United States American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Other Similar Organizations (except Business, Professional, Labor, and Political Organizations) Periodical Publishers Commercial Printing (except Screen and Books) Other printing All Other Publishers Book Publishers Other publishers Manuscripts Scholarly communication Benchmarking (Management) Comparative studies Open access publishing Descriptive statistics Research funding Newsletters ab: Purpose: This study examined the effect of open access (OA) status on scholarly and societal metrics of impact (citation counts and altmetric scores, respectively) across manuscripts published in the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) Journals. Method: Three thousand four hundred nineteen manuscripts published in four active ASHA Journals were grouped across three access statuses based on their availability to the public: Gold OA, Green OA, and Closed Access. Two linear mixed-effects models tested the effects of OA status on citation counts and altmetric scores of the manuscripts. Results: Both Green OA and Gold OA significantly predicted a 2.70 and 5.21 respective increase in citation counts compared with Closed Access manuscripts (p < .001). Gold OA was estimated to predict a 25.7-point significant increase in altmetric scores (p < .001), but Green OA was only marginally significant (p = .68) in predicting a 1.44 increase in altmetric scores relative to Closed Access manuscripts. Discussion: Communication sciences and disorders (CSD) research that is fully open receives more online attention and, overall, more scientific attention than research that is paywalled or available through Green OA methods. Additional research is needed to understand secondary variables affecting these and other scholarly and societal metrics of impact across studies in CSD. Ongoing support and incentives to reduce the inequities of OA publishing are critical for continued scientific advancement. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|