"Wait and See": Effects of Matching Visual Stimulation on Impulsive Behavior during an Adaptation of Flora et al.'s (1992) Choice Task.
Flora et al. (The Psychological Record, 42(4), 505–517, 1992, The Psychological Record, 53, 243–252, 2003) reported that response-independent aversive noise and cold water increased impulsive responses during a choice task in which participants earned points exchangeable for money. The impulsive opt...
| Publicado en: | Psychological Record Vol. 73; no. 2; pp. 203 - 221 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Jun2023
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=164433394&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 164433394 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00332933 PSD jtl: Psychological Record issn: 00332933 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jun2023 vid: 73 iid: 2 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 164433394 10.1007/s40732-023-00536-2 ppf: 203 ppct: 18 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 1.3MB tig: atl: "Wait and See": Effects of Matching Visual Stimulation on Impulsive Behavior during an Adaptation of Flora et al.'s (1992) Choice Task. aug: au: Hurtado-Parrado, Camilo Cifuentes, Julián D. Henao, Karen Bohórquez, Carolina Sanchez, Christian Forigua, Juan Carlos Arias-Higuera, Monica Velasquez, Julian Camilo Acevedo-Triana, Cesar affil: School of Psychological and Behavioral Sciences, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL, USA Department of Psychology, Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz, Bogotá, Colombia Department of Psychology, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia School of Psychology, Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia, Tunja, Colombia su: Reinforcement (Psychology) Apathy Self-control Botany Visual perception Image registration Aversive stimuli sug: subj: Reinforcement (Psychology) Apathy Self-control Botany Visual perception Image registration Aversive stimuli keyword: Aversive control Impulsive behavior International affective picture system (IAPS) Matching-to-sample Self-control behavior Aversive control Impulsive behavior International affective picture system (IAPS) Matching-to-sample Self-control behavior ab: Flora et al. (The Psychological Record, 42(4), 505–517, 1992, The Psychological Record, 53, 243–252, 2003) reported that response-independent aversive noise and cold water increased impulsive responses during a choice task in which participants earned points exchangeable for money. The impulsive option immediately produced 2 points. The self-controlled option produced 10 points after a 16-s delay. Common to those studies was the pain-related nature of the aversive stimulation implemented; however, it is unknown if other types of aversive stimulation (e.g., symbolic, nonpain-related; Crosbie, 1998) would produce the same effect. The present study tested if aversive images from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS; Bradley & Lang, 2007) increased impulsive responses during a systematic replication of Flora et al.'s (The Psychological Record, 42(4), 505–517, 1992) procedure. During interspersed trials added to the original choice task, college students (126; 60 men, 66 women) searched for a stimulus hidden in aversive, appetitive, or neutral IAPS images. This matching-to-sample task was intended to increase interaction with the images. Preference for the self-control option was observed in the absence of matching trials, which replicated Flora et al.'s (The Psychological Record, 42(4), 505–517, 1992) control condition and underscored the generality of the choice task. Matching IAPS images, irrespective of their valence, increased the number of impulsive responses, reaching indifference. This pattern of indifference resembled that observed in previous studies in which both aversive or nonaversive stimuli (noise and lukewarm water) were implemented. Procedural aspects possibly explain these results, including aversive or distracting effects of frequent failure to match the images, weak-eliciting functions of the visual stimuli, or differences in trial-by-trial and overall (all trials) rates of reinforcement. Flora et al.'s task overall shows promise to continue studying how contextual factors may affect impulsive behavior, including other aversive stimuli (e.g., point loss). pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|