Dissemination and Implementation Science Training: Pilot Study Approach for Expanding Nutrition Professionals' Competency...Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior (SNEB) International Conference, July 20-23, 2023, District of Columbia.

To assess acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness, change in knowledge, and expertise among participants who enrolled in a Dissemination and Implementation Science (D&I) training. The design-focus framework, theory of planned behavior, and Validated D&I competences developed the training's l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Nutrition Education & Behavior Vol. 55; no. 7; pp. 69 - 71
Autores principales: Walker, Ayron, Olfert, Melissa
Formato: abstract proceedings research Journal Article
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. 2023 Supplement
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=164856903&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 164856903
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        14994046
        IXG
      jtl: Journal of Nutrition Education & Behavior
      issn: 14994046
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2023 Supplement
      vid: 55
      iid: 7
      pid: 467
      pub: Elsevier B.V.
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        164856903
        164856903
        164856903
        10.1016/j.jneb.2023.05.153
        164856903
      ppf: 69
      ppct: 2
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Dissemination and Implementation Science Training: Pilot Study Approach for Expanding Nutrition Professionals' Competency...Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior (SNEB) International Conference, July 20-23, 2023, District of Columbia.
      aug:
        au:
          Walker, Ayron
          Olfert, Melissa
        affil: Appalachian State University
      sug:
        subj:
          Diffusion of Innovation Education
          Implementation Science Education
          Students, Dietetics
          Student Attitudes Evaluation
          Student Knowledge Evaluation
          Congresses and Conferences District of Columbia
          District of Columbia
          Human
          Pilot Studies
          Questionnaires
          Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
          Descriptive Statistics
          Thematic Analysis
      ab: To assess acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness, change in knowledge, and expertise among participants who enrolled in a Dissemination and Implementation Science (D&I) training. The design-focus framework, theory of planned behavior, and Validated D&I competences developed the training's learning strategies, course materials and structure. Nutrition undergraduate students at an Appalachian University. An eight-week, online training met once a week for an hour via Zoom. Students completed case studies, discussions, and developed an implementation plan for an evidence-based nutrition program to improve students understanding and expertise in implementation science. A 40-item pre survey and 42-item post survey were used to test if self-efficacy and expertise change after intervention and Implementation Outcomes to identify feasibility intervention. A two-tailed Wilcoxon-signed rank test assessed significance in mean differences. Qualitative exit interviews were thematically analyzed and categorized with quantitative results for Implementation Outcomes (5-pt) and Kirkpatrick Learning measures (10-pt). Knowledge scores (n=8) were significantly higher after the intervention (6.75 ± 0.68) compared to before (4.13 ± 0.68), p= 0.0234, and supported by the Kirkpatrick Scale quantitative (mean scores between 6.94 ± 1.7 (Learning),7.35 ± 1.9 (Reaction)) and qualitative findings. Expertise rankings were significantly higher after the intervention (3.14 ± 0.29) compared to before (1.86 ± 0.29), p=0.0313. Qualitative results align with the validated psychometric Implementation Outcome findings (3.59 ± 1.26, appropriateness score 3.94 ± 0.85, feasibility score of 4.09 ± 0.67) and support continued implementation of the training. The absence of nutrition-focused D&I science training created a capacity barrier in nutrition, which hindered ability to evaluate implementation of interventions. This pilot study suggests that a nutrition-specific D&I science training increased knowledge and expertise among participants; and implementation outcomes suggest that this approach is feasible, acceptable, and appropriate resource to build knowledge and expertise in nutrition D&I science. This provides a feasible, acceptable, and appropriate resource for nutrition to build knowledge and expertise in D&I science. None
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        abstract
        proceedings
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N