Burkinis, Burqas, and Marilyn Manson: Religious Expression in the French and American Public Spheres.
The United States and France each possess a liberal and a republican tradition stretching back to their origins as revolutionary regimes. However, as the epigraph from Justice Scalia suggests, it is widely believed that each polity gives rise to very different outcomes concerning the presence or abs...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Religion Vol. 103; no. 3; pp. 283 - 313 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
University of Chicago Press
Jul2023
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=164916787&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 164916787 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00224189 JRE jtl: Journal of Religion issn: 00224189 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jul2023 vid: 103 iid: 3 pid: 415 pub: University of Chicago Press artinfo: ui: 164916787 10.1086/724848 ppf: 283 ppct: 30 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 228KB tig: atl: Burkinis, Burqas, and Marilyn Manson: Religious Expression in the French and American Public Spheres. aug: au: Tate, John William affil: University of Newcastle, Australia su: Burkinis Burqas (Islamic clothing) Public sphere Dresses Epigraphists sug: subj: Burkinis Burqas (Islamic clothing) Public sphere Dresses Epigraphists ab: The United States and France each possess a liberal and a republican tradition stretching back to their origins as revolutionary regimes. However, as the epigraph from Justice Scalia suggests, it is widely believed that each polity gives rise to very different outcomes concerning the presence or absence of religion in the public sphere. This article cautions against perceiving too great a contrast between the United States and France in this respect by pointing to exceptions to this rule, and it explains these exceptions in terms of the ongoing contestation of the liberal and republican traditions within each polity. Indeed, contrary to Scalia, it points to instances of deep parallel between the United States and France on matters of religion in the public sphere, culminating in what I call the "American Headscarf Affair." In this respect we see how the presence or absence of religion within each polity, as manifest in the public sphere, is not inevitable but very much the product of ongoing contestation, centered on political and judicial activity. The "religion" within the public sphere to which the article refers, and upon which it focuses, concerns individual religious expression, manifest in matters of speech and dress. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Journal of Religion is the property of University of Chicago Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Journal of Religion holder: University of Chicago Press dt: @attributes: year: 2023 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|