RETHINKING THE PAST AND ANTICIPATING THE FUTURE OF RELIGION AND SCIENCE.
John Caiazza presents the current technoculture as the latest development in the ongoing conflict of science and religion that began with Tertullian in the third century. I argue that his presentation is historically inaccurate, because for most of Western history science and religion interacted wit...
| Publicado en: | Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science Vol. 40; no. 1; pp. 33 - 42 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Open Library of Humanities
Mar2005
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=16499099&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 16499099 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 05912385 ZYG jtl: Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science issn: 05912385 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Mar2005 vid: 40 iid: 1 pid: 15576 pub: Open Library of Humanities artinfo: ui: 16499099 10.1111/j.1467-9744.2005.00640.x ppf: 33 ppct: 9 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 36KB tig: atl: RETHINKING THE PAST AND ANTICIPATING THE FUTURE OF RELIGION AND SCIENCE. aug: au: Tirosh-Samuelson, Hava affil: professor of history, Arizona State University, P.O. Box 874302, Tempe, AZ 85287-4302 su: Religion & science Religion Science Science & civilization Postmodernism (Philosophy) Cultural movements sug: subj: Religion & science Religion Science Science & civilization Postmodernism (Philosophy) Cultural movements keyword: church fathers double-truth theory feminism Leo Strauss paideia pictorialism postmodernism Tertullian Thomas Aquinas University of Paris ab: John Caiazza presents the current technoculture as the latest development in the ongoing conflict of science and religion that began with Tertullian in the third century. I argue that his presentation is historically inaccurate, because for most of Western history science and religion interacted with and cross-fertilized each other. Contrary to Caiazza's misleading presentation, Western thought did not follow the dichotomous model polemically posed by Tertullian. I take issue with Caiazza's portrayal of postmodernism and his claim that technology is the foundation of an inherently secularist culture. I conclude by highlighting certain ethical challenges engendered by the prevalence of new technologies and present the dialogue of science and religion as uniquely qualified to address these challenges. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science is the property of Open Library of Humanities and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science holder: Open Library of Humanities dt: @attributes: year: 2005 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|