Justice in the Family: A Defence of Feminist Contractarianism.

Jean Hampton argues that we can detect exploitation in personal relationships by thinking about what we would agree to were we to set aside the emotional benefits we receive from those relationships. Hampton calls her account“feminist contractarianism,” but it has recently been critiqued as decidedl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Applied Philosophy Vol. 22; no. 1; pp. 45 - 55
Autor principal: Radzik, Linda
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Apr2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=16510267&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 16510267
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        02643758
        BQ0
      jtl: Journal of Applied Philosophy
      issn: 02643758
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2005
      vid: 22
      iid: 1
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        16510267
        10.1111/j.1468-5930.2005.00291.x
      ppf: 45
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 457KB
      tig:
        atl: Justice in the Family: A Defence of Feminist Contractarianism.
      aug:
        au: Radzik, Linda
        affil: Department of Philosophy & Humanities, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-4237, USA
      su:
        Contractarianism (Ethics)
        Feminists
        Families
        Exploitation of humans
        Feminism
      sug:
        subj:
          Contractarianism (Ethics)
          Feminists
          Families
          Exploitation of humans
          Feminism
      ab: Jean Hampton argues that we can detect exploitation in personal relationships by thinking about what we would agree to were we to set aside the emotional benefits we receive from those relationships. Hampton calls her account“feminist contractarianism,” but it has recently been critiqued as decidedly un-feminist, on the grounds that it is hostile to women's interests and women's values. Furthermore, Hampton's requirement that we imaginatively distance ourselves from our emotional connections to our loved ones— the key element in her contractarian test— is simply ad hoc. In this essay, I will evaluate these objections and offer a new justification for Hampton's test. I conclude that feminist contractarianism is not only a useful tool for detecting exploitation in the family, it is also deserving of its feminist label.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Journal of Applied Philosophy is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Journal of Applied Philosophy
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2005
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N