The Scope of Memory-Based Processing.

In this article, we articulate the critical differences between memory-based processing and explanation-based processing. We suggest that the most important claim of memory-based text processing is that the automatic processes that function with respect to text processing are all applications of ord...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Discourse Processes Vol. 39; no. 2/3; pp. 225 - 243
Autores principales: Gerrig, Richard J., O'Brien, Edward J.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd May2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=16542322&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 16542322
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0163853X
        7LQ
      jtl: Discourse Processes
      issn: 0163853X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: May2005
      vid: 39
      iid: 2/3
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        16542322
        10.1207/s15326950dp3902&3_7
      ppf: 225
      ppct: 18
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: The Scope of Memory-Based Processing.
      aug:
        au:
          Gerrig, Richard J.
          O'Brien, Edward J.
        affil:
          Stony Brook University
          University of New Hampshire
      su:
        Memory
        Intellect
        Comprehension
        Explanation (Linguistics)
        Text processing (Computer science)
      sug:
        subj:
          Memory
          Intellect
          Comprehension
          Explanation (Linguistics)
          Text processing (Computer science)
      ab: In this article, we articulate the critical differences between memory-based processing and explanation-based processing. We suggest that the most important claim of memory-based text processing is that the automatic processes that function with respect to text processing are all applications of ordinary memory processes. This claim contrasts with explanation-based accounts that argue that some automatic processes are special to text processing and enact particular reader goals. We review evidence that supports the memory-based approach but we also suggest how it might properly be falsified.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2005
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N