Implementation of welfare technology: a systematic review of barriers and facilitators.
Although studies addressing barriers to and facilitators of implementation of welfare technology have been published, no systematic review synthesising evidence on such factors has been found. The purpose of this study was therefore to identify and synthesise existing primary research on facilitator...
| Publicado en: | Disability & Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology Vol. 18; no. 6; pp. 913 - 929 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , |
| Formato: | research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Aug2023
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=165472403&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 165472403 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 17483107 1X04 jtl: Disability & Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology issn: 17483107 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Aug2023 vid: 18 iid: 6 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 165472403 150908121 165472403 165472403 10.1080/17483107.2021.1938707 165472403 ppf: 913 ppct: 16 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Implementation of welfare technology: a systematic review of barriers and facilitators. aug: au: Zander, Viktoria Gustafsson, Christine Landerdahl Stridsberg, Sara Borg, Johan affil: School of Health, Care, and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Eskilstuna, Sweden sug: subj: Social Welfare Program Implementation Technology Utilization Caregivers Persons with Disabilities Frail Elderly Human Systematic Review Male Female Sweden Funding Source PubMed Psycinfo CINAHL Database Functional Status Attitude Stakeholder Participation Life Style Knowledge Male Female ab: Although studies addressing barriers to and facilitators of implementation of welfare technology have been published, no systematic review synthesising evidence on such factors has been found. The purpose of this study was therefore to identify and synthesise existing primary research on facilitators and barriers that influence the implementation of welfare technology for older people, people with disabilities and informal caregivers. A systematic search in 11 databases was performed using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria to identify empirical studies that assess the implementation of welfare technology for older people, people with disabilities or informal caregivers. The search identified 33 publications with quantitative, qualitative and mixed method designs. The reported findings were thematically synthesised and conceptualised into themes. Six themes of facilitators and barriers that influence the implementation of welfare technology emerged: capacity, attitudes and values, health, expectations, participation and identity and lifestyle. These were presented from five perspectives: older persons and persons with disabilities, informal caregivers, health and care personnel, organisation and infrastructure and technology. The findings may be used as a means to structure the planning and evaluation of implementation processes of welfare technologies for older persons and persons with disabilities and to understand the complexities of implementation. This knowledge generates deepened insights and structures to guide and evaluate the implementation processes of welfare technologies and engenders an understanding of the complexities of implementation. When planning for the implementation of welfare technology for older people and persons with disabilities, it is important to consider capacity, attitudes and values, health, expectations, participation, and identity and lifestyle. Using the result from the study facilitates deepened insights and structures for evaluation of implementation processes of welfare technologies and brings an understanding of the complexities of implementation. Welfare technology should be available, safe, usable and fit the user's daily lives. Implementable welfare technology should focus on needs, but also consider design and possible experienced stigma related to the identity of being a welfare technology user. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|