Qualitative Theory and Chemical Explanation.

Roald Hoffmann and other theorists claim that we ought to use highly idealized chemical models ("qualitative models") in order to increase our understanding of chemical phenomena, even though other models are available which make more highly accurate predictions. I assess this norm by examining one...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Philosophy of Science Vol. 71; no. 5; pp. 1071 - 1082
Main Author: Weisberg, Michael
Format: Article
Published: Cambridge University Press Dec2004
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=16630090&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 16630090
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00318248
        PSC
      jtl: Philosophy of Science
      issn: 00318248
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2004
      vid: 71
      iid: 5
      pid: 15979
      pub: Cambridge University Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        16630090
        10.1086/428011
      ppf: 1071
      ppct: 11
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 77KB
      tig:
        atl: Qualitative Theory and Chemical Explanation.
      aug:
        au: Weisberg, Michael
        affil: Department of Philosophy, University of Pennsylvania, 433 Logan Hall, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
      su:
        Chemical models
        Theory of knowledge
        Comprehension
        Norm (Philosophy)
        Philosophy of science
        Explanation
      sug:
        subj:
          Chemical models
          Theory of knowledge
          Comprehension
          Norm (Philosophy)
          Philosophy of science
          Explanation
      ab: Roald Hoffmann and other theorists claim that we ought to use highly idealized chemical models ("qualitative models") in order to increase our understanding of chemical phenomena, even though other models are available which make more highly accurate predictions. I assess this norm by examining one of the tradeoffs faced by model builders and model users-the tradeoff between precision and generality. After arguing that this tradeoff obtains in many cases, I discuss how the existence of this tradeoff can help us defend Hoffmann's norm for modelling.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Philosophy of Science is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Philosophy of Science
      holder: Cambridge University Press
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2004
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N