Instantaneous Motion.

There is a longstanding definition of instantaneous velocity. It says that the velocity at t of an object moving along a coordinate line is r if and only if the value of the first derivative of the object's position function at t is r. The goal of this paper is to determine to what extent this defin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophical Studies Vol. 110; no. 1; pp. 49 - 68
Autor principal: Carroll, John W.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Jul2002
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=16630696&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 16630696
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00318116
        4L8
      jtl: Philosophical Studies
      issn: 00318116
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul2002
      vid: 110
      iid: 1
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        16630696
        10.1023/A:1019824927383
      ppf: 49
      ppct: 19
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 108KB
      tig:
        atl: Instantaneous Motion.
      aug:
        au: Carroll, John W.
        affil: Department of Philosophy and Religion, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8103, USA (E-mail: )
      su:
        Philosophy
        Tooley, Michael
        Bigelow, John
        Pargetter, Robert
        Motion
      sug:
        subj:
          Philosophy
          Tooley, Michael
          Bigelow, John
          Pargetter, Robert
          Motion
      ab: There is a longstanding definition of instantaneous velocity. It says that the velocity at t of an object moving along a coordinate line is r if and only if the value of the first derivative of the object's position function at t is r. The goal of this paper is to determine to what extent this definition successfully underpins a standard account of motion at an instant. Counterexamples proposed by Michael Tooley (1988) and also by John Bigelow and Robert Pargetter (1990) are reinforced and illuminated by considering the presence or absence of changes to the object's motion.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Philosophical Studies is a copyright of Springer, 2002. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Philosophical Studies
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2002
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N