From Contextualism to Contrastivism.

In the article, the author argues that contrastivism resolves the main philosophical problems of contextualism, by employing a better linguistic model. He states three theses that he takes to define contextualism about knowledge, and three parallel but contrasting theses that he uses to define contr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophical Studies Vol. 119; no. 1/2; pp. 73 - 104
Autor principal: Schaffer, Jonathan
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature May2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=16670369&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 16670369
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00318116
        4L8
      jtl: Philosophical Studies
      issn: 00318116
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: May2004
      vid: 119
      iid: 1/2
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        16670369
        10.1023/B:PHIL.0000029351.56460.8c
      ppf: 73
      ppct: 31
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 163KB
      tig:
        atl: From Contextualism to Contrastivism.
      aug:
        au: Schaffer, Jonathan
        affil: University of Massachusetts-Amherst, 157 Fayette Street, Watertown, MA 02472, USA E-mail:
      su:
        Contextualism (Philosophy)
        Language & languages
        Linguistics
        Theory of knowledge
        Dogmatism
        Philosophy
      sug:
        subj:
          Contextualism (Philosophy)
          Language & languages
          Linguistics
          Theory of knowledge
          Dogmatism
          Philosophy
      ab: In the article, the author argues that contrastivism resolves the main philosophical problems of contextualism, by employing a better linguistic model. He states three theses that he takes to define contextualism about knowledge, and three parallel but contrasting theses that he uses to define contrastivism, his alternative to contextualism. He then argues that each of his three theses is superior to its counterpart. He emphasizes that his contrasting sets of theses are designed to leave both of the doctrines he is comparing neutral about the details of the analysis of knowledge.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Philosophical Studies is a copyright of Springer, 2004. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Philosophical Studies
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2004
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N