The Trouble with Moral Rights.

It is usually argued that moral rights are severely handicapped by their inconsistent entrenchment in common law and civilian legal systems. This article argues that the main trouble with moral rights protection is that the justifications for the existence of these rights are riddled with internal i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Modern Law Review Vol. 68; no. 3; pp. 411 - 435
Autor principal: Masiyakurima, Patrick
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell May2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=16765067&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 16765067
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00267961
        D8H
      jtl: Modern Law Review
      issn: 00267961
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: May2005
      vid: 68
      iid: 3
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        16765067
        10.1111/j.1468-2230.2005.00544.x
      ppf: 411
      ppct: 24
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 236KB
      tig:
        atl: The Trouble with Moral Rights.
      aug:
        au: Masiyakurima, Patrick
        affil: 1University of Aberdeen
      su:
        Moral rights (Copyright)
        Customary law
        Usages of trade
        Authors
        Justification (Christian theology)
        Exploitation of humans
      sug:
        subj:
          Moral rights (Copyright)
          Customary law
          Usages of trade
          Authors
          Justification (Christian theology)
          Exploitation of humans
      ab: It is usually argued that moral rights are severely handicapped by their inconsistent entrenchment in common law and civilian legal systems. This article argues that the main trouble with moral rights protection is that the justifications for the existence of these rights are riddled with internal inconsistencies generated by the vagaries of copyright exploitation. Harmonising moral rights protection or using moral rights justifications cumulatively may not resolve the theoretical inconsistencies. Copyright protection must therefore be seriously overhauled if moral rights are to be widely perceived as vehicles for protecting authors' rights.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Modern Law Review is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Modern Law Review
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2005
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N