Sentencing Disparity and Artificial Intelligence.

The idea of using artificial intelligence as a support system in the sentencing process has attracted increasing attention. For instance, it has been suggested that machine learning algorithms may help in curbing problems concerning inter-judge sentencing disparity. The purpose of the present articl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Value Inquiry Vol. 57; no. 3; pp. 447 - 463
Main Author: Ryberg, Jesper
Format: Article
Published: Springer Nature Sep2023
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=169781262&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 169781262
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00225363
        OJ8
      jtl: Journal of Value Inquiry
      issn: 00225363
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2023
      vid: 57
      iid: 3
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        169781262
        10.1007/s10790-021-09835-9
      ppf: 447
      ppct: 16
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 595KB
      tig:
        atl: Sentencing Disparity and Artificial Intelligence.
      aug:
        au: Ryberg, Jesper
        affil: Roskilde University, 4000, Roskilde, Denmark
      su:
        Artificial intelligence
        Machine learning
      sug:
        subj:
          Artificial intelligence
          Machine learning
      keyword:
        Disparity
        Proportionality
        Sentencing
      ab: The idea of using artificial intelligence as a support system in the sentencing process has attracted increasing attention. For instance, it has been suggested that machine learning algorithms may help in curbing problems concerning inter-judge sentencing disparity. The purpose of the present article is to examine the merits of this possibility. It is argued that, insofar as the unfairness of sentencing disparity is held to reflect a retributivist view of proportionality, it is not necessarily the case that increasing inter-judge uniformity in sentencing is desirable. More generally, it is shown that the idea of introducing machine learning algorithms, that produce sentencing predictions on the ground of a dataset that is built of previous sentencing decisions, faces serious problems if there exists a discrepancy between actual sentencing practice and the sentences that are ideally desirable.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Journal of Value Inquiry is a copyright of Springer, 2023. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Journal of Value Inquiry
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2023
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N