Evaluation of Semiautomatic and Deep Learning–Based Fully Automatic Segmentation Methods on [18F]FDG PET/CT Images from Patients with Lymphoma: Influence on Tumor Characterization.

The objective is to assess the performance of seven semiautomatic and two fully automatic segmentation methods on [18F]FDG PET/CT lymphoma images and evaluate their influence on tumor quantification. All lymphoma lesions identified in 65 whole-body [18F]FDG PET/CT staging images were segmented by tw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Digital Imaging Vol. 36; no. 4; pp. 1864 - 1877
Autores principales: Constantino, Cláudia S., Leocádio, Sónia, Oliveira, Francisco P. M., Silva, Mariana, Oliveira, Carla, Castanheira, Joana C., Silva, Ângelo, Vaz, Sofia, Teixeira, Ricardo, Neves, Manuel, Lúcio, Paulo, João, Cristina, Costa, Durval C.
Formato: diagnostic images research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Aug2023
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=169808818&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 169808818
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        08971889
        DOQ
      jtl: Journal of Digital Imaging
      issn: 08971889
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2023
      vid: 36
      iid: 4
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        169808818
        163068826
        169808818
        169808818
        10.1007/s10278-023-00823-y
        169808818
      ppf: 1864
      ppct: 13
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Evaluation of Semiautomatic and Deep Learning–Based Fully Automatic Segmentation Methods on [18F]FDG PET/CT Images from Patients with Lymphoma: Influence on Tumor Characterization.
      aug:
        au:
          Constantino, Cláudia S.
          Leocádio, Sónia
          Oliveira, Francisco P. M.
          Silva, Mariana
          Oliveira, Carla
          Castanheira, Joana C.
          Silva, Ângelo
          Vaz, Sofia
          Teixeira, Ricardo
          Neves, Manuel
          Lúcio, Paulo
          João, Cristina
          Costa, Durval C.
        affil: Nuclear Medicine – Radiopharmacology Department, Champalimaud Foundation, Av. Brasília, 1400-038, Lisbon, Portugal
      sug:
        subj:
          Lymphoma Diagnosis
          Fludeoxyglucose F 18 Diagnostic Use
          Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography Methods
          Deep Learning
          Automation
          Reproducibility of Results
          Human
          Intraclass Correlation Coefficient
          Intrarater Reliability
          Interrater Reliability
          Image Processing, Computer Assisted
          Equipment Design
          Funding Source
      ab: The objective is to assess the performance of seven semiautomatic and two fully automatic segmentation methods on [18F]FDG PET/CT lymphoma images and evaluate their influence on tumor quantification. All lymphoma lesions identified in 65 whole-body [18F]FDG PET/CT staging images were segmented by two experienced observers using manual and semiautomatic methods. Semiautomatic segmentation using absolute and relative thresholds, k-means and Bayesian clustering, and a self-adaptive configuration (SAC) of k-means and Bayesian was applied. Three state-of-the-art deep learning–based segmentations methods using a 3D U-Net architecture were also applied. One was semiautomatic and two were fully automatic, of which one is publicly available. Dice coefficient (DC) measured segmentation overlap, considering manual segmentation the ground truth. Lymphoma lesions were characterized by 31 features. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) assessed features agreement between different segmentation methods. Nine hundred twenty [18F]FDG-avid lesions were identified. The SAC Bayesian method achieved the highest median intra-observer DC (0.87). Inter-observers' DC was higher for SAC Bayesian than manual segmentation (0.94 vs 0.84, p < 0.001). Semiautomatic deep learning–based median DC was promising (0.83 (Obs1), 0.79 (Obs2)). Threshold-based methods and publicly available 3D U-Net gave poorer results (0.56 ≤ DC ≤ 0.68). Maximum, mean, and peak standardized uptake values, metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis showed excellent agreement (ICC ≥ 0.92) between manual and SAC Bayesian segmentation methods. The SAC Bayesian classifier is more reproducible and produces similar lesion features compared to manual segmentation, giving the best concordant results of all other methods. Deep learning–based segmentation can achieve overall good segmentation results but failed in few patients impacting patients' clinical evaluation.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        diagnostic images
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N