Musical grouping as prosodic implementation.
This paper reviews evidence concerning the nature of grouping in music and language and their interactions with other linguistic and musical systems. I present brief typological surveys of the relationship between constituency and acoustic parameters in language and music, drawing from a wide variet...
| Publicado en: | Linguistics & Philosophy Vol. 46; no. 4; pp. 959 - 989 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Aug2023
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=169809049&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 169809049 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 01650157 OJI jtl: Linguistics & Philosophy issn: 01650157 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Aug2023 vid: 46 iid: 4 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 169809049 10.1007/s10988-022-09365-y ppf: 959 ppct: 30 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 588KB tig: atl: Musical grouping as prosodic implementation. aug: au: Katz, Jonah affil: Department of World Languages, Literatures and Linguistics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA su: Musical groups Language & languages Linguistics Musical form Modularity (Grammar) sug: subj: Musical groups Language & languages Linguistics Musical form Modularity (Grammar) keyword: Gestalt Grouping Language Modularity Music Prosody ab: This paper reviews evidence concerning the nature of grouping in music and language and their interactions with other linguistic and musical systems. I present brief typological surveys of the relationship between constituency and acoustic parameters in language and music, drawing from a wide variety of languages and musical genres. The two domains both involve correspondence between auditory discontinuities and group boundaries, reflecting the Gestalt principles of proximity and similarity, as well as a nested, hierarchical organization of constituents. Typically, computational-level theories of musical grouping take the form of a function from acoustic properties through grouping representations to syntactic or interpretive constituents. Linguistic theories tend to be cast as functions in the opposite direction. This study argues that the difference in orientation is not grounded in principled differences in information flow between the two domains, and that reconceptualizing one or both theories allows for gains in analytical understanding. There are also obvious differences between musical and linguistic grouping. Grappling with those differences requires one to think in detail about modularity, information flow, levels of description, and the functional nature of cognitive domains. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Linguistics & Philosophy is a copyright of Springer, 2023. All Rights Reserved. item: Linguistics & Philosophy holder: Springer Nature dt: @attributes: year: 2023 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|