ChatGPT: "To Be or Not to Be" in Bikini Bottom.

Objective: In this report, we tested ChatGPT's ability to think abstractly and to integrate information about two seemingly disparate topics by requesting a well-articulated, intellectually stimulating essay in response to a complex and somewhat paradoxical task. Method: We asked ChatGPT to write a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Psychiatry: Interpersonal & Biological Processes Vol. 86; no. 3; pp. 249 - 255
Autores principales: Weingrad, Aaron B., Cozza, Stephen J.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Fall2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=169847696&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 169847696
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00332747
        PST
      jtl: Psychiatry: Interpersonal & Biological Processes
      issn: 00332747
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Fall2023
      vid: 86
      iid: 3
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        169847696
        10.1080/00332747.2023.2238617
      ppf: 249
      ppct: 6
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: ChatGPT: "To Be or Not to Be" in Bikini Bottom.
      aug:
        au:
          Weingrad, Aaron B.
          Cozza, Stephen J.
      su:
        Judgment (Psychology)
        Artificial intelligence
        Task performance
        Metaphor
        Written communication
        Figures of speech
        Thought & thinking
      sug:
        subj:
          Judgment (Psychology)
          Artificial intelligence
          Task performance
          Metaphor
          Written communication
          Figures of speech
          Thought & thinking
      ab: Objective: In this report, we tested ChatGPT's ability to think abstractly and to integrate information about two seemingly disparate topics by requesting a well-articulated, intellectually stimulating essay in response to a complex and somewhat paradoxical task. Method: We asked ChatGPT to write a satirical essay comparing SpongeBob Squarepants to Shakespeare's Hamlet and examined its ability to create a cohesive essay using abstract thinking. Findings: ChatGPT's comparison of Hamlet and SpongeBob was successful, comprehensive, and convincing, demonstrating the ability to make judgments and to use appropriate metaphors and idioms. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that ChatGPT can respond to complex tasks using abstract thinking.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N