Comparison of prone and upright, stereotactic, and tomosynthesis-guided biopsies with secondary analysis of ultrasound-occult architectural distortions.

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:European Radiology Vol. 33; no. 9; pp. 6189 - 6204
Autores principales: Cohen, Ethan O., Korhonen, Katrina E., Sun, Jia, Leung, Jessica W. T.
Formato: Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Sep2023
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=169870788&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 169870788
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09387994
        NPH
      jtl: European Radiology
      issn: 09387994
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2023
      vid: 33
      iid: 9
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        169870788
        163036350
        10.1007/s00330-023-09581-5
        169870788
      ppf: 6189
      ppct: 15
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Comparison of prone and upright, stereotactic, and tomosynthesis-guided biopsies with secondary analysis of ultrasound-occult architectural distortions.
      aug:
        au:
          Cohen, Ethan O.
          Korhonen, Katrina E.
          Sun, Jia
          Leung, Jessica W. T.
        affil: Division of Diagnostic Imaging, Department of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe, Unit 1350, 77030, Houston, TX, USA
      sug:
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
      ab:
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N