A new challenge for contingentists.

Contingentism is the view that it is contingent which things exist. Despite its plausibility, advocates of contingentism face a well-known 'challenge' to demonstrate that they can draw what appear to be intelligible modal distinctions (Williamson Modal Logic as Metaphysics. Oxford University Press,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophical Studies Vol. 180; no. 8; pp. 2457 - 2485
Autor principal: Roberts, Alexander
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Aug2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=169870919&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 169870919
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00318116
        4L8
      jtl: Philosophical Studies
      issn: 00318116
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2023
      vid: 180
      iid: 8
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        169870919
        10.1007/s11098-023-01942-6
      ppf: 2457
      ppct: 28
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 1.2MB
      tig:
        atl: A new challenge for contingentists.
      aug:
        au: Roberts, Alexander
        affil: Oriel College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
      su:
        Plausibility (Logic)
        Modal logic
        First-order logic
        Necessity (Philosophy)
        Modern logic
      sug:
        subj:
          Plausibility (Logic)
          Modal logic
          First-order logic
          Necessity (Philosophy)
          Modern logic
      keyword:
        Contingentism
        Modality
        Necessitism
        Second-order logic
      ab: Contingentism is the view that it is contingent which things exist. Despite its plausibility, advocates of contingentism face a well-known 'challenge' to demonstrate that they can draw what appear to be intelligible modal distinctions (Williamson Modal Logic as Metaphysics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2013). In this article, I argue that if certain controversial modal principles fail, the challenge contingentists face becomes much more difficult. Whereas extant challenges concern contingentists' inability to draw quite theoretical second-order modal distinctions, I present a challenge which concerns contingentists' inability to draw simpler first-order distinctions. This indicates that in certain modal settings there may well be significant first-order barriers to maintaining contingentism.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Philosophical Studies is a copyright of Springer, 2023. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Philosophical Studies
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2023
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N