Robustness and Dark-Matter Observation.
Current cosmological observations place little constraints on the nature of dark matter, allowing the development of a large number of models and various methods for probing their properties, which seem to provide ideal grounds for the employment of robustness arguments. In this article, the extent...
| Publicado en: | Philosophy of Science Vol. 90; no. 3; pp. 629 - 648 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
Jul2023
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=169947437&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 169947437 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00318248 PSC jtl: Philosophy of Science issn: 00318248 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jul2023 vid: 90 iid: 3 pid: 15979 pub: Cambridge University Press artinfo: ui: 169947437 10.1017/psa.2023.50 ppf: 629 ppct: 19 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 282KB tig: atl: Robustness and Dark-Matter Observation. aug: au: Antoniou, Antonis affil: Department of Philosophy, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK Department of History and Philosophy of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece su: Dark matter Argument sug: subj: Dark matter Argument ab: Current cosmological observations place little constraints on the nature of dark matter, allowing the development of a large number of models and various methods for probing their properties, which seem to provide ideal grounds for the employment of robustness arguments. In this article, the extent to which such arguments can be used to overcome various methodological and theoretical challenges is examined. The conclusion is that although robustness arguments have a limited scope in the context of dark-matter research, they can still be used to increase the scientists' confidence about the properties of specific models. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Philosophy of Science is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Philosophy of Science holder: Cambridge University Press dt: @attributes: year: 2023 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|