Rethinking Integration of Epistemic Strategies in Social Understanding: Examining the Central Role of Mindreading in Pluralist Accounts.

In recent years, theories of social understanding have moved away from arguing that just one epistemic strategy, such as theory-based inference or simulation constitutes our ability of social understanding. Empirical observations speak against any monistic view and have given rise to pluralistic acc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Erkenntnis Vol. 88; no. 7; pp. 2967 - 2996
Main Authors: Wolf, Julia, Coninx, Sabrina, Newen, Albert
Format: Article
Published: Springer Nature Oct2023
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=170062829&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 170062829
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01650106
        5KZ
      jtl: Erkenntnis
      issn: 01650106
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2023
      vid: 88
      iid: 7
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        170062829
        10.1007/s10670-021-00486-7
      ppf: 2967
      ppct: 29
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 666KB
      tig:
        atl: Rethinking Integration of Epistemic Strategies in Social Understanding: Examining the Central Role of Mindreading in Pluralist Accounts.
      aug:
        au:
          Wolf, Julia
          Coninx, Sabrina
          Newen, Albert
        affil: Institute for Philosophy II, Ruhr University Bochum, Universitätsstraße 150, 44780, Bochum, Germany
      su:
        Verstehen
        Social skills
        Inference (Logic)
        Attribution (Social psychology)
        Open-ended questions
      sug:
        subj:
          Verstehen
          Social skills
          Inference (Logic)
          Attribution (Social psychology)
          Open-ended questions
      ab: In recent years, theories of social understanding have moved away from arguing that just one epistemic strategy, such as theory-based inference or simulation constitutes our ability of social understanding. Empirical observations speak against any monistic view and have given rise to pluralistic accounts arguing that humans rely on a large variety of epistemic strategies in social understanding. We agree with this promising pluralist approach, but highlight two open questions: what is the residual role of mindreading, i.e. the indirect attribution of mental states to others within this framework, and how do different strategies of social understanding relate to each other? In a first step, we aim to clarify the arguments that might be considered in evaluating the role that epistemic strategies play in a pluralistic framework. On this basis, we argue that mindreading constitutes a core epiststrategy in human social life that opens new central spheres of social understanding. In a second step, we provide an account of the relation between different epistemic strategies which integrates and demarks the important role of mindreading for social understanding.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Erkenntnis is a copyright of Springer, 2023. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Erkenntnis
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2023
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N