SELF, SUBJECT, AND CHOSEN SUBJECTIONRabbinic Ethics and Comparative Possibilities.
This paper formulates the categories of“ethics,”“self,” and“subject” for an analysis of classical rabbinic ethics centered on the text,The Fathers According to Rabbi Nathan. Early rabbis were concerned with the realms of life that today's scholars describe as ethics and self-cultivation, yet they ha...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Religious Ethics Vol. 33; no. 2; pp. 255 - 292 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Jun2005
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=17065741&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 17065741 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 03849694 REH jtl: Journal of Religious Ethics issn: 03849694 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Jun2005 vid: 33 iid: 2 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 17065741 10.1111/j.1467-9795.2005.00192.x ppf: 255 ppct: 37 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 146KB tig: atl: SELF, SUBJECT, AND CHOSEN SUBJECTIONRabbinic Ethics and Comparative Possibilities. aug: au: Wyn Schofer, Jonathan su: Self (Philosophy) Subject (Philosophy) Jewish ethics Religious ethics Ethics Rabbis sug: subj: Self (Philosophy) Subject (Philosophy) Jewish ethics Religious ethics Ethics Rabbis keyword: comparative ethics late ancient Judaism rabbinic thought self subject Zhuangzi ab: This paper formulates the categories of“ethics,”“self,” and“subject” for an analysis of classical rabbinic ethics centered on the text,The Fathers According to Rabbi Nathan. Early rabbis were concerned with the realms of life that today's scholars describe as ethics and self-cultivation, yet they had no overarching concepts for either the self/person or for ethics. This analysis, then, cannot rely only upon native rabbinic terminology, but also requires a careful use of contemporary categories. This paper first sets out basic features ofRabbi Nathanand presents appropriate formulations of the relevant scholarly terms. The latter sections address possibilities for employing and revising these categories in descriptive and comparative studies more broadly, first surveying relevant scholarship on Christian, Muslim, and Manichaean sources, and then turning to ancient East Asian sources with a particular focus upon passages in theZhuangzi. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Journal of Religious Ethics is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Journal of Religious Ethics holder: Wiley-Blackwell dt: @attributes: year: 2005 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|