Can Rawlsian Containment of Hateful Viewpoints Be Effective?

While most of the literature has attempted to justify harsh and soft containment given some fundamental commitments of political liberalism, I focus on how justified forms of containment can in themselves be deemed effective. This article shows that a reading of Rawls allows for a comparison of diff...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Social Theory & Practice Vol. 49; no. 4; pp. 681 - 708
Autor principal: Fumagalli, Corrado
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Florida State University Oct2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=170735005&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 170735005
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0037802X
        STP
      jtl: Social Theory & Practice
      issn: 0037802X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2023
      vid: 49
      iid: 4
      pid: 150
      pub: Florida State University
    artinfo:
      ui:
        170735005
        10.5840/soctheorpract202221151
      ppf: 681
      ppct: 27
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 4.5MB
      tig:
        atl: Can Rawlsian Containment of Hateful Viewpoints Be Effective?
      aug:
        au: Fumagalli, Corrado
        affil: Università degli Studi di Genova
      su:
        Citizens
        Liberalism
        Hate speech
      sug:
        subj:
          Citizens
          Liberalism
          Hate speech
      keyword:
        containment
        counterspeech
        hate speech bans
        hateful viewpoints
        Rawls
        stability
        threats
        containment
        counterspeech
        hate speech bans
        hateful viewpoints
        Rawls
        stability
        threats
      ab: While most of the literature has attempted to justify harsh and soft containment given some fundamental commitments of political liberalism, I focus on how justified forms of containment can in themselves be deemed effective. This article shows that a reading of Rawls allows for a comparison of different containment practices based on their capacity to protect the stability of liberal democracies under serious threat. And, in making it possible to compare harsh and soft containment, I evaluate immediate stability gains against citizens' judgements about their liberal democratic institutions.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N