Do they see what he experiences? Objectification and sexual harassment.
Two studies tested the hypothesis that men who are sexually objectified during an interview will experience a negative emotion, rate the experience as harassing, and perform badly on tasks compared to un‐objectified controls. However, observers who watch videos of objectified experiencers and predic...
| Publicado en: | Analyses of Social Issues & Public Policy Vol. 23; no. 2; pp. 418 - 453 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Aug2023
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=170748980&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 170748980 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 15297489 N7Y jtl: Analyses of Social Issues & Public Policy issn: 15297489 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Aug2023 vid: 23 iid: 2 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell place: Malden, Massachusetts artinfo: ui: 170748980 164445847 170748980 170748980 10.1111/asap.12354 170748980 ppf: 418 ppct: 35 formats: tig: atl: Do they see what he experiences? Objectification and sexual harassment. aug: au: Wiener, Richard L. Vardsveen, Trace C. Petty, Taylor affil: Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska‐Lincoln, Lincoln Nebraska,, USA sug: subj: Sexual Harassment Emotions Men Psychosocial Factors Task Performance and Analysis Evaluation Human Videorecording Interpersonal Relations Male Female Sex Factors Students, Undergraduate Psychosocial Factors Job Interviews Interviews Models, Statistical Repeated Measures Study Design Pleasure Forecasting Judgment Evaluation Social Behavior Male Female ab: Two studies tested the hypothesis that men who are sexually objectified during an interview will experience a negative emotion, rate the experience as harassing, and perform badly on tasks compared to un‐objectified controls. However, observers who watch videos of objectified experiencers and predictors who read about the interaction will demonstrate stronger effects, with women showing the strongest. In Study 1, 90 undergraduates (60 men) were interviewees or watched a video of a mock job interview in a 2 (objectification: objectifying interview vs. non‐objectifying interview) × 3 (perspective: experiencer who was a man vs. observers, some men and some women) mixed model design with repeated measures on the second factor. In Study 2, 71 undergraduates read about a job interview in a 2 (objectification: objectifying vs. non‐objectifying interview) × 2 (gender: man vs. woman) between‐subjects design. Results showed that while objectified experiencers (men) showed no objectification effects, observers and predictors anticipated a reasonable person would experience more harassment than the experiencers reported, with observers' enjoyment of sexualization moderating these forecasts. Additionally, the predictors' forecasted negative emotions mediated the effects of objectification on judgments and task performance. These studies argue for informing Title VII's 2‐prong subjective‐objective test with social fact testimony in same‐sex harassment cases. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|