Survivor guilt.

We often feel survivor guilt when the very circumstances that harm others leave us unscathed. Although survivor guilt is both commonplace and intelligible, it raises a puzzle for the standard philosophical account of guilt, according to which people feel guilt only when they take themselves to be mo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophical Studies Vol. 180; no. 9; pp. 2707 - 2727
Autores principales: MacKenzie, Jordan, Zhao, Michael
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Sep2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=171308139&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 171308139
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00318116
        4L8
      jtl: Philosophical Studies
      issn: 00318116
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2023
      vid: 180
      iid: 9
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        171308139
        10.1007/s11098-023-02002-9
      ppf: 2707
      ppct: 20
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 621KB
      tig:
        atl: Survivor guilt.
      aug:
        au:
          MacKenzie, Jordan
          Zhao, Michael
        affil:
          Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
          University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA
      su:
        Survivor guilt
        Solidarity
        Blame
        Distributive justice
        Ethics
      sug:
        subj:
          Survivor guilt
          Solidarity
          Blame
          Distributive justice
          Ethics
      keyword:
        Desert
        Guilt
        Moral luck
        Self-justification
      ab: We often feel survivor guilt when the very circumstances that harm others leave us unscathed. Although survivor guilt is both commonplace and intelligible, it raises a puzzle for the standard philosophical account of guilt, according to which people feel guilt only when they take themselves to be morally blameworthy. The standard account implies that survivor guilt is uniformly unfitting, as people are not blameworthy simply for having fared better than others. In this paper, we offer a rival account of guilt, the relational account of guilt, which makes sense of survivor guilt and other forms of guilt without self-blame while preserving the intelligibility of guilt about culpable wrongdoing. According to this account, guilt involves the feeling of being unable to justify ourselves to others, and we lack self-justification when we (however blamelessly) stand on the positive side of an undesirable asymmetry with them. When someone survives something that those around her do not, the disparity in outcome constitutes an asymmetry that is often undesirable, because it arises from luck or violates a requirement of solidarity. Thus, survivor guilt is often fitting.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Philosophical Studies is a copyright of Springer, 2023. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Philosophical Studies
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2023
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N