John Henry Newman: Bernard Lonergan's 'Fundamental Mentor and Guide'.
Abstract: Reason has reasons of which 'reason' knows nothing. It was this essential insight, along with the methodological prioritisation of a phenomenology of cognition and the recognition of the epistemological distinctiveness of judgment, that a young Bernard Lonergan gleaned from his study of Jo...
| Publicado en: | Heythrop Journal Vol. 64; no. 5; pp. 669 - 695 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Sep2023
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=171312818&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 171312818 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00181196 D84 jtl: Heythrop Journal issn: 00181196 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Sep2023 vid: 64 iid: 5 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 171312818 10.1111/heyj.14242 ppf: 669 ppct: 26 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 264KB tig: atl: John Henry Newman: Bernard Lonergan's 'Fundamental Mentor and Guide'. aug: au: Scordino, Anthony J. affil: University of Notre Dame su: Newman, John Henry, 1801-1890 Lonergan, Bernard J. F., 1904-1984 Phenomenology Theory of knowledge Hermeneutics sug: subj: Newman, John Henry, 1801-1890 Lonergan, Bernard J. F., 1904-1984 Phenomenology Theory of knowledge Hermeneutics ab: Abstract: Reason has reasons of which 'reason' knows nothing. It was this essential insight, along with the methodological prioritisation of a phenomenology of cognition and the recognition of the epistemological distinctiveness of judgment, that a young Bernard Lonergan gleaned from his study of John Henry Newman's Grammar of Assent. Given that the 'later', post‐Insight (1953) Lonergan enacted a more explicit transposition of his thought into a hermeneutical and existential framework, one might be tempted to assume that this coincided with a drift away from his tutelage under the nineteenth‐century Englishman. Indeed, an examination of the secondary literature detailing their relationship would suggest as much. Yet, in the hope of contributing to the regrettably sparse Newman‐Lonergan scholarship and proposing a modest recalibration therein, I argue that the more existential, hermeneutical, and committed to the philosophical turn to concrete socio‐historical subjectivity Lonergan grew, the more fruit his early Newmanian formation bore. By analysing Newman's proto‐Lonerganian anticipations in the areas of self‐appropriation, conversion, the relationship of subjectivity to objectivity, and the hermeneutical nature of consciousness, I will contend that Newman—a presciently continental mind writing as one untimely born into an analytical milieu—was the wellspring from which Lonergan never ceased to draw. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Heythrop Journal is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Heythrop Journal holder: Wiley-Blackwell dt: @attributes: year: 2023 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|