The Problem of the Quranic al-ṣamad.
Angelika Neuwirth has argued that sura 112 of the Quran is intended as an intertextual corrective commentary on key Jewish and Christian creedal statements. This theory, consonant with recent scholarship considering the Muslim scripture to be a text of late antiquity, would match the enigmatic phras...
| Publicado en: | Journal of the American Oriental Society Vol. 143; no. 3; pp. 607 - 632 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
American Society for Premodern Asia (ASPA)
Jul-Sep2023
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=171576709&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 171576709 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00030279 JOY jtl: Journal of the American Oriental Society issn: 00030279 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jul-Sep2023 vid: 143 iid: 3 pid: 1463 pub: American Society for Premodern Asia (ASPA) artinfo: ui: 171576709 10.7817/jaos.143.3.2023.ar024 ppf: 607 ppct: 25 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 6.7MB tig: atl: The Problem of the Quranic al-ṣamad. aug: au: HAMMOND, ANDREW affil: UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD su: Neuwirth, Angelika Qur'an Christianity Muslims Apologetics sug: subj: Neuwirth, Angelika Qur'an Christianity Muslims Apologetics ab: Angelika Neuwirth has argued that sura 112 of the Quran is intended as an intertextual corrective commentary on key Jewish and Christian creedal statements. This theory, consonant with recent scholarship considering the Muslim scripture to be a text of late antiquity, would match the enigmatic phrase Allāh al-ṣamad with the Nicene creed's description of God as "almighty" (pantokrator) and sura 112's statement that God has no equal (kufuʾ) with the Nicene creed's homoousia, the term that throughout the seventh century ce remained central to the bitter doctrinal conflict wracking Eastern Christianity. This article surveys the wide debate in the scholarly literature over these quranic verses, and specifically the hapax legomenon of al-ṣamad, and compares the early Muslim exegetical treatment of al-ṣamad with the approach of contemporaneous Christian polemical writing of the late eighth century. It suggests that the key to unlocking the meaning of the sura and al-ṣamad, which has long vexed both premodern and modern scholars, could lie in the concept of Aristotelian substance and its articulation in the trinitarian formula and ensuing christological disputes. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Journal of the American Oriental Society is the property of American Society for Premodern Asia (ASPA) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Journal of the American Oriental Society holder: American Society for Premodern Asia (ASPA) dt: @attributes: year: 2023 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|