High Impact for Whom? A Qualitative Analysis of Organization Concerns About the Transition to High-Impact Prevention Policy.
HIV represents a significant health burden in the United States. In 2012, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) stopped recommending many once-promoted interventions as part of a shift from one HIV intervention policy, Diffusion of Effective Behavioral Interventions (DEBI), to another...
| Publicado en: | Health Promotion Practice Vol. 24; no. 5; pp. 932 - 944 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Sage Publications Inc.
Sep2023
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=171587414&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 171587414 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 15248399 IS2 jtl: Health Promotion Practice issn: 15248399 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Sep2023 vid: 24 iid: 5 pid: 344 pub: Sage Publications Inc. place: Thousand Oaks, California artinfo: ui: 171587414 156755185 171587414 171587414 10.1177/15248399221091537 171587414 ppf: 932 ppct: 12 formats: tig: atl: High Impact for Whom? A Qualitative Analysis of Organization Concerns About the Transition to High-Impact Prevention Policy. aug: au: Reid, Miranda J. Tetteh, Emmanuel K. Ingaiza, Lucy M. Bradley, Cory D. Dolcini, M. Margaret McKay, Virginia R. affil: Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA sug: subj: HIV Infections Prevention and Control Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.) Health Policy Implementation Science Patient Attitudes Human Male Female Adult Middle Age Case Studies Multimethod Studies Cross Sectional Studies Semi-Structured Interview Videoconferencing Grounded Theory Thematic Analysis Descriptive Statistics Adult: 19-44 years Middle Aged: 45-64 years Male Female ab: HIV represents a significant health burden in the United States. In 2012, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) stopped recommending many once-promoted interventions as part of a shift from one HIV intervention policy, Diffusion of Effective Behavioral Interventions (DEBI), to another, High Impact Prevention (HIP). Twenty-nine staff members from 10 organizations were interviewed to explore how organizations reacted to this shift. Three major themes emerged: (1) Personal experience, community assessment, and epidemiological evidence influenced organizations' perceptions of efficacy and preference for earlier interventions. (2) Organizations were concerned that HIP interventions were not a good fit for their priority populations. (3) Organizations were frustrated with the top-down approach by the CDC prioritizing HIP interventions over earlier interventions. These results indicate that organizations continue to see value in and provide DEBI interventions. In addition, a more participatory process incorporating qualitative evidence and organizations' experiences may be necessary to achieve widespread de-implementation of DEBI interventions. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|