Recruitment strategies in couple intervention studies: A systematic review of recruitment methods and sample characteristics in the United States from 2015 to 2020.
Including diverse participants in couple intervention studies is critical for developing an evidence base that informs best practices for all potential clients. Research has shown that subgroups of clients respond differently to different interventions and that interventions that have been adapted t...
| Publicado en: | Family Process Vol. 62; no. 3; pp. 880 - 899 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
| Formato: | research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Sep2023
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=171918166&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 171918166 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 00147370 3UA jtl: Family Process issn: 00147370 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Sep2023 vid: 62 iid: 3 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell place: Malden, Massachusetts artinfo: ui: 171918166 163206979 171918166 171918166 10.1111/famp.12885 171918166 ppf: 880 ppct: 19 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: C – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Recruitment strategies in couple intervention studies: A systematic review of recruitment methods and sample characteristics in the United States from 2015 to 2020. aug: au: Tseng, Chi‐Fang Miller, Debra L. Huerta, Patricia PettyJohn, Morgan E. Yzaguirre, Melissa M. Agundez, J. C. Wittenborn, Andrea K. affil: Human Development and Family Studies, Michigan State University, East Lansing Michigan,, USA sug: subj: Couples Counseling Trends Research Subjects Psychosocial Factors Research Subject Recruitment Methods Research Subject Recruitment Trends Cultural Diversity Human Systematic Review United States Ethnic Groups Psychosocial Factors Sexual Identity Income Social Class ab: Including diverse participants in couple intervention studies is critical for developing an evidence base that informs best practices for all potential clients. Research has shown that subgroups of clients respond differently to different interventions and that interventions that have been adapted to fit the needs of a given population are more effective than non‐adapted interventions. Unfortunately, couple intervention samples often exclude participants with marginalized identities and culturally adapted couple intervention research is limited. The lack of information about best practices for diverse client subgroups perpetuates mental and relational health disparities. We conducted a systematic review to examine recruitment strategies and sampling characteristics of diverse races/ethnicities, incomes, ages, and sexual identities. We reviewed articles published between January 2015 and December 2020. Articles were eligible for inclusion in our review if they implemented an intervention with couples in the United States. Of 4054 articles identified, 54 articles were eligible for our review. Findings suggest that couple intervention studies lack diversity across multiple identity domains (i.e., races/ethnicities, incomes, ages, and sexual identities). Further, descriptions of recruitment strategies are often vague, limiting opportunities to better understand methods used to recruit diverse samples. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|