Emancipatory approaches in couples' intervention research.
A lack of diversity exists in couples research with an overrepresentation of white, middle to upper income couples. Additionally, researchers often do not reflect the study sample, particularly when studying underrepresented minority and historically marginalized (URM‐HM) populations. Emancipatory r...
| Publicado en: | Family Process Vol. 62; no. 3; pp. 899 - 915 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Sep2023
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=171918169&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 171918169 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 00147370 3UA jtl: Family Process issn: 00147370 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Sep2023 vid: 62 iid: 3 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell place: Malden, Massachusetts artinfo: ui: 171918169 163573796 171918169 171918169 10.1111/famp.12890 171918169 ppf: 899 ppct: 16 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Emancipatory approaches in couples' intervention research. aug: au: Daire, Andrew P. Carlson, Ryan G. Pointer, Ashley affil: Department of Counseling & Special Education, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond Virginia,, USA sug: subj: Couples Counseling Research, Medical Research Subjects Psychosocial Factors Minority Groups Psychosocial Factors Medically Underserved Empowerment Research Personnel Conceptual Framework Reflexivity (Research) Power Accountability Consumer Participation Research Subject Recruitment ab: A lack of diversity exists in couples research with an overrepresentation of white, middle to upper income couples. Additionally, researchers often do not reflect the study sample, particularly when studying underrepresented minority and historically marginalized (URM‐HM) populations. Emancipatory research practices focus on language, processes, and practices to ensure that researchers and the research they conduct honor and contribute to the empowerment of the URM‐HM research participants. Therefore, in this paper, we discuss five critical considerations with recommendations for emancipatory research practices for including couples from URM‐HM populations. The aim is to provide a framework for researchers to critically reflect on their work with URM‐HM populations. The research practices include: (a) research positionality and reflexivity; (b) understanding of the population being served; (c) power and empowerment; (d) accountability, voice, and participant engagement; and (e) research that benefits URM‐HM populations and challenges the systems that perpetuate inequities. Additionally, we present practical strategies to implement these five considerations based on our own experiences conducting community‐effectiveness studies with low‐income and diverse couples. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|