Implementation of a vascular access specialist team in a tertiary hospital: a cost-benefit analysis.

Background: The use of peripherally inserted central catheters and midline catheters is growing due to their potential benefits. These devices can increase patient safety and satisfaction while reducing the use of resources. As a result, many hospitals are establishing vascular access specialist tea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cost Effectiveness & Resource Allocation Vol. 21; no. 1; pp. 1 - 9
Main Authors: Ricou Ríos, Laura, Esposito Català, Candela, Pons Calsapeu, Arnau, Adroher Mas, Cristina, Andrés Martínez, Isabel, Nuño Ruiz, Isaac, Castellà Creus, Mònica, Castellà Fàbregas, Laia, García Quesada, Maria José, Estrada Cuxart, Oriol, Ara del Rey, Jordi, López Seguí, Francesc
Format: research tables/charts Journal Article
Published: BioMed Central 9/16/2023
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=171994923&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 171994923
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        14787547
        1CL9
      jtl: Cost Effectiveness & Resource Allocation
      issn: 14787547
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 9/16/2023
      vid: 21
      iid: 1
      pid: 24147
      pub: BioMed Central
    artinfo:
      ui:
        171994923
        171994923
        171994923
        10.1186/s12962-023-00464-6
        171994923
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 8
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Implementation of a vascular access specialist team in a tertiary hospital: a cost-benefit analysis.
      aug:
        au:
          Ricou Ríos, Laura
          Esposito Català, Candela
          Pons Calsapeu, Arnau
          Adroher Mas, Cristina
          Andrés Martínez, Isabel
          Nuño Ruiz, Isaac
          Castellà Creus, Mònica
          Castellà Fàbregas, Laia
          García Quesada, Maria José
          Estrada Cuxart, Oriol
          Ara del Rey, Jordi
          López Seguí, Francesc
        affil: https://ror.org/04wkdwp52 Direcció d'Estratègia Assistencial, Gerència Territorial Metropolitana Nord, Institut Català de la Salut, Barcelona, Spain
      sug:
        subj:
          Implementation Science
          Association for Vascular Access
          Multidisciplinary Care Team
          Tertiary Health Care
          Outcome Assessment
          Human
          Cost Benefit Analysis
          Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters
          Patient Safety
          Patient Satisfaction
          Health Care Costs
          Economic Factors
          Nursing Care
          Ultrasonography
      ab: Background: The use of peripherally inserted central catheters and midline catheters is growing due to their potential benefits. These devices can increase patient safety and satisfaction while reducing the use of resources. As a result, many hospitals are establishing vascular access specialist teams staffed by nurses who are trained in the insertion and maintenance of these catheters. The objective of the study is to evaluate previously to the implementation whether the benefits of introducing ultrasound-guided peripheral venous catheters, midline catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters compared to current practice by a vascular access specialist team outweigh their costs. Methods: Cost-benefit analysis from the perspective of the healthcare provider based on administrative data. The study estimates the reduction in resources used when changing the current practice for the use of ultrasound-guided midline and PICC catheters, as well as the additional resources required for their use. Results: The use of an ultrasound-guided device on peripherally inserted central carheter, results in a measurable resource reduction of approximately €31. When 3 peripheral venous catheters are replaced by an ultrasound-guided peripherally inserted central catheter, the saving is €63. Similarly, the use of an ultrasound-guided device on a midline catheter, results in a reduction of €16, while each ultrasound-guided midline catheter replacing 3 peripheral venous catheters results in a reduction of €96. Conclusion: The benefits of using ultrasound-guided midline and PICC catheters compared to current practice by introducing a vascular access specialist team trained in the implantation of ultrasound-guided catheters, outweigh its cost mainly because of the decrease in hospital stay due to the lowered risk of phebitis. These results motivate the implementation of the service, adding to previous experience suggesting that it is also preferable from the point of view of patient safety and satisfaction.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N