Perceptions of abortion access across the United States prior to the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision: Results from a national survey.

Context: Abortion is common in the United States (US), although access is becoming more difficult for some. In addition to restrictive policies that ban most abortion, limit the number of providers and increase costs, barriers to access also include less supportive cultural climates and stigma relat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Perspectives on Sexual & Reproductive Health Vol. 55; no. 3; pp. 153 - 165
Autores principales: Crawford, Brandon L., Simmons, Megan K., Turner, Ronna C., Lo, Wen‐Juo, Jozkowski, Kristen N.
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Sep2023
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=171999515&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 171999515
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        15386341
        K87
      jtl: Perspectives on Sexual & Reproductive Health
      issn: 15386341
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2023
      vid: 55
      iid: 3
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        171999515
        165096653
        171999515
        171999515
        10.1363/psrh.12238
        171999515
      ppf: 153
      ppct: 12
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Perceptions of abortion access across the United States prior to the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision: Results from a national survey.
      aug:
        au:
          Crawford, Brandon L.
          Simmons, Megan K.
          Turner, Ronna C.
          Lo, Wen‐Juo
          Jozkowski, Kristen N.
        affil: Department of Applied Health Science, School of Public Health, Indiana University Bloomington, Indiana, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Attitude to Abortion Evaluation
          Health Knowledge Evaluation
          Health Services Accessibility
          Abortion, Induced Legislation and Jurisprudence
          Sociodemographic Factors
          Health Policy
          Human
          United States
          Open-Ended Questionnaires
          Structured Questionnaires
          Adult
          Male
          Female
          Multiple Logistic Regression
          Thematic Analysis
          English Language
          Spanish Language
          Cross Sectional Studies
          Descriptive Statistics
          Quota Sample
          kappa Statistic
          Middle Age
          Confidence Intervals
          Relative Risk
          Stigma
          Health Care Costs
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Context: Abortion is common in the United States (US), although access is becoming more difficult for some. In addition to restrictive policies that ban most abortion, limit the number of providers and increase costs, barriers to access also include less supportive cultural climates and stigma related to abortion. Prior to the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health decision of the United States Supreme Court, research suggested that people generally believed it was easy to access abortion, but this research did not examine the underlying factors that drive these perceptions. Methods: In 2019, using data from closed and open‐ended survey questions, we examined differences in people's assessment of abortion access within the state they reside and factors that influence those perceptions. We recruited English‐ and Spanish‐speaking US adults (N = 2599) from Qualtrics' national panel using quota‐based sampling to participate in a web‐based survey. We used multinomial logistic regression to examine predictors of access perceptions across demographic characteristics and thematic analysis to analyze open‐ended responses. Results: Fifty‐three percent of participants believed abortion was easy to access in their state. Spanish speakers and participants from legislatively "hostile" states were more likely to perceive access as difficult. Legality‐related knowledge and pro‐life identity were associated with perceiving abortion access as easy. Conclusions: Prior to Dobbs, participants' interpretation of the ease or difficulty of accessing abortion were subjective. Misconceptions about state abortion laws and the prevalence of providers were common, suggesting a need for more education about abortion laws, policies, and access.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N