Theosemiosis: An essay on consilience and the perennial philosophy.

Can the divide between science and religion be bridged? The current article will present the case for semiotics - and specifically the process of theosemiosis - as that platform of connection. In order to present this argument a key issue that must be tackled is whether there is one underlying funct...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Sign Systems Studies Vol. 51; no. 2; pp. 398 - 433
Autor principal: Kalkman, Matthew L.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: University of Tartu 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=172033803&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 172033803
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        14064243
        DSW
      jtl: Sign Systems Studies
      issn: 14064243
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2023
      vid: 51
      iid: 2
      pid: 25096
      pub: University of Tartu
    artinfo:
      ui:
        172033803
        10.12697/SSS.2023.51.2.10
      ppf: 398
      ppct: 35
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 2.5MB
      tig:
        atl: Theosemiosis: An essay on consilience and the perennial philosophy.
      aug:
        au: Kalkman, Matthew L.
        affil: School of Theology and Religious Studies, University of Tartu, Ülikooli 18, Tartu 51005, Estonia
      su:
        Krishna (Hindu deity)
        Semiotics
        Perennials
        Philosophy
        Cognition
        Religion & science
        Bacon
        Theory of knowledge
        Logic
      sug:
        subj:
          Krishna (Hindu deity)
          Semiotics
          Perennials
          Philosophy
          Cognition
          Religion & science
          Bacon
          Theory of knowledge
          Logic
      keyword:
        consilience
        embodied cognition
        logic
        perennial philosophy
        religion
        theosemiosis
      ab:
        Can the divide between science and religion be bridged? The current article will present the case for semiotics - and specifically the process of theosemiosis - as that platform of connection. In order to present this argument a key issue that must be tackled is whether there is one underlying function within the category of religion that can be extracted and held accountable in its knowledge claims: what has generally been termed the perennial philosophy. This extracted principle must then be capable of conforming to a broader model of consilience that can contain the knowledge captured in both science and religion. A model that can equally explain the work of Aristotle, Bacon, Galilee, and Einstein as it does Moses, Buddha, Jesus and Krishna, both in an ontological and epistemological sense; and thus a modification and extension of Enlightenment principles in such a way that they can capture the western and eastern notions of that light. In this regard, seeing truly is 'knowing'.
        Kas teaduse ja religiooni vahelist lõhet on võimalik ületada? Artiklis pakutakse välja võimalus, et semiootika - konkreetselt teosemioosi protsess - on selline ühendusplatvorm. Selle väite esitamisel on oluline käsitleda võtmeküsimust, kas religiooni kategoorias on olemas mingi põhifunktsioon, mida saab esile tuua ja mida saab pidada selle teadmisväidetes vastutavaks; see, mida on üldiselt nimetatud philosophia perennis. Selline välja selitatud printsiip peab suutma vastata laiemale kokkulangevusmudelile, mis võib hõlmata nii teadusesse kui ka religiooni kätketud teadmisi, mudelile, mis suudab võrdselt seletada nii Aristotelese, Baconi, Galilei ja Einsteini töid kui ka Moosese, Buddha, Jeesuse ja Krishna tegevust, ja seda nii ontoloogilises kui ka epistemoloogilises mõttes. Niisiis on tegu, valgustusega, mis hõlmab nii lääne kui ka ida määratlusi tollest valgusest. See tähendab, et nägemine tõepoolest on ,teadmine'.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Sign Systems Studies is the property of University of Tartu and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Sign Systems Studies
      holder: University of Tartu
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2023
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N