Le «pan-propositionnalisme» de Jean Wyclif.

This paper shows how Wyclif is able at the same time (i) to claim that whatever is is a proposition ("pan-propositionalism") and (ii) to develop a nontrivial theory of propositional truth and falsity. The study has two parts: 1) Starting from Wyclif's fivefold propositional typology – including a pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Vivarium Vol. 43; no. 1; pp. 124 - 156
Autor principal: Cesalli, Laurent
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Brill Academic Publishers 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=17228461&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 17228461
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00427543
        C6F
      jtl: Vivarium
      issn: 00427543
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2005
      vid: 43
      iid: 1
      pid: 639
      pub: Brill Academic Publishers
    artinfo:
      ui:
        17228461
        10.1163/1568534054068384
      ppf: 124
      ppct: 32
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 371KB
      tig:
        atl: Le «pan-propositionnalisme» de Jean Wyclif.
      aug:
        au: Cesalli, Laurent
        affil: Albert-Ludwigs-Universität
      su:
        Proposition (Logic)
        Wycliffe, John, d. 1384
      sug:
        subj:
          Proposition (Logic)
          Wycliffe, John, d. 1384
      ab: This paper shows how Wyclif is able at the same time (i) to claim that whatever is is a proposition ("pan-propositionalism") and (ii) to develop a nontrivial theory of propositional truth and falsity. The study has two parts: 1) Starting from Wyclif's fivefold propositional typology – including a propositio realis (real proposition) and a sic esse sicut propositio significat (a fact) – we will analyse (a) the three different kinds of real predication, (b) the distinction between primary and secondary signification of propositions (the latter being an instantiation of the former) and (c) the status of logical truth as opposed to (but depending on) metaphysical truth. Furthermore, the notion of ens logicum (as intermediate between statements and facts) will be compared to Walter Burley's propositio in re of which it appears to be a close analogon. 2) The second part deals with two semantic and metaphysical implications of the "pan-propositionalism": (a) the extended notion of being (ampliatio entis) called upon to explain the truth of so-called non-standard propositions (e.g. past, future, modal) and (b) the relation between contents of the divine mind as "arch-truth-makers" and eternal as well as contingent truths.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: French
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Vivarium is the property of Brill Academic Publishers and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Vivarium
      holder: Brill Academic Publishers
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2005
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N