In vitro evaluation of a computer-assisted decision support system for the primary care of polytrauma patients.

Introduction: The management of polytraumatized patients is set in a stressful environment with numerous critical decisions in a brief amount of time. Working along a standardised procedure can improve the outcome for these patients and reduce mortality. To help clinical practitioners, we developed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:European Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery Vol. 49; no. 5; pp. 2187 - 2193
Main Authors: Vogel, Christoph, Neumann, Juliane, Kießling, Lisa, Hempel, Gunther, Neumuth, Thomas, Kleber, Christian, Osterhoff, Georg
Format: pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Published: Springer Nature Oct2023
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=172329428&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 172329428
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        18639933
        3C05
      jtl: European Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery
      issn: 18639933
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2023
      vid: 49
      iid: 5
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        172329428
        164167121
        172329428
        172329428
        10.1007/s00068-023-02295-9
        172329428
      ppf: 2187
      ppct: 6
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: In vitro evaluation of a computer-assisted decision support system for the primary care of polytrauma patients.
      aug:
        au:
          Vogel, Christoph
          Neumann, Juliane
          Kießling, Lisa
          Hempel, Gunther
          Neumuth, Thomas
          Kleber, Christian
          Osterhoff, Georg
        affil: https://ror.org/028hv5492 Department of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
      sug:
        subj:
          Decision Support Systems, Management
          Primary Health Care
          Multiple Trauma
          Workflow
          Job Performance Evaluation
          Guideline Adherence
          Human
          Students, Medical
          Workload
          Interns and Residents
          Adult
          Female
          Male
          Descriptive Statistics
          Simulations
          Questionnaires
          Life Support Care
          Treatment Outcomes
          Stress, Occupational
          Chi Square Test
          Data Analysis Software
          In Vitro Studies
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Female
          Male
      ab: Introduction: The management of polytraumatized patients is set in a stressful environment with numerous critical decisions in a brief amount of time. Working along a standardised procedure can improve the outcome for these patients and reduce mortality. To help clinical practitioners, we developed "TraumaFlow", a workflow management system for the primary care of polytrauma patients based on the current treatment guidelines. This study sought to validate the system and investigate its effect on user performance and perceived workload. Methods: The computer-assisted decision support system was tested in two scenarios in a trauma room of a level 1 trauma centre by 11 final-year medical students and 3 residents. In simulated polytrauma scenarios, the participants functioned as a trauma leader. The first scenario was performed without decision support and the second with support by "TraumaFlow" via tablet. During each scenario, the performance was evaluated in a standardized assessment. After each scenario, the participants answered a questionnaire on workload [NASA Raw Task Load Index (NASA RTLX)]. Results: In total, 14 participants (mean 28 ± 4 years, 43% female) managed 28 scenarios. During the first scenario without computer-assisted support, the participants achieved a mean of 6.6 out of 12 points (SD 1.2, range 5 to 9). With the support of TraumaFlow, the mean performance score was significantly higher with 11.6 out of 12 points (SD 0.5, range 11 to 12, p < 0.001). In the 14 scenarios performed without support, there was no run in which no errors were made. In comparison, ten of the 14 scenarios performed with TraumaFlow ran free of relevant errors. The mean improvement in the performance score was 42%. There was a significant decrease in the mean self-reported mental stress level in scenarios with support of TraumaFlow (55, SD 24) as compared to scenarios without support (72, SD 13, p = 0.041). Conclusion: In a simulated environment, computer-assisted decision-making improved the performance of the trauma leader, helped to adhere to clinical guidelines, and reduced stress in a fast-acting environment. In reality, this may improve the treatment outcome for the patient.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N