Epigram Reading Epigram: Antipater of Sidon "Coming Second" (Anth. Pal. 9.25).
Anthologia Palatina 9.25, an important testimonium for the reception of Aratus' Phaenomena , is either ascribed to Leonidas of Tarentum or Antipater in the manuscript tradition. In this article, I propose that the epigram was authored by Antipater of Sidon. First, I demonstrate that the poem, which—...
| Publicado en: | Classical Philology Vol. 118; no. 4; pp. 484 - 507 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
University of Chicago Press
Oct2023
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=172434836&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 172434836 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 0009837X CPL jtl: Classical Philology issn: 0009837X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Oct2023 vid: 118 iid: 4 pid: 415 pub: University of Chicago Press artinfo: ui: 172434836 10.1086/726650 ppf: 484 ppct: 23 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 1001KB tig: atl: Epigram Reading Epigram: Antipater of Sidon "Coming Second" (Anth. Pal. 9.25). aug: au: Zuenelli, Simon affil: Leopold-Franzens-Universität Innsbruck su: Epigram Manuscripts Authorship Semantics Analogy sug: subj: Epigram Manuscripts Authorship Semantics Analogy ab: Anthologia Palatina 9.25, an important testimonium for the reception of Aratus' Phaenomena , is either ascribed to Leonidas of Tarentum or Antipater in the manuscript tradition. In this article, I propose that the epigram was authored by Antipater of Sidon. First, I demonstrate that the poem, which—as I suggest—is modeled on Callimachus 56 HE (Epigr. 27 Pf.), self-consciously reflects its own secondary position within the literary tradition. Secondly, I show that this interest in epigonism is closely paralleled by epigrams authored by Antipater of Sidon, which exhibit both a similar imitative method and an interest in "secondness." In so doing, my analysis also suggests innovative approaches for the readings of several of Antipater's epigrams and sheds new light on his poetics of imitation more generally. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Classical Philology is the property of University of Chicago Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Classical Philology holder: University of Chicago Press dt: @attributes: year: 2023 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|