A Systematic Review of the Impact of Derived Relational Responding Technology in Raising Intelligence Scores.

The current review summarizes the literature on the impact of derived relational responding (DRR) technology on raising intelligence scores. We conducted a systematic review of peer-reviewed studies in PsycINFO, ERIC, and Web of Science between 1985 and 2021. Fourteen publications involving 15 exper...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Psychological Record Vol. 73; no. 3; pp. 339 - 362
Autores principales: Beck, Carmen, Garcia, Yors, Brothers, Lisa, Mahoney, Amanda, Rancourt, Raymond C., Andrews, Meredith
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Sep2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=172445431&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 172445431
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00332933
        PSD
      jtl: Psychological Record
      issn: 00332933
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2023
      vid: 73
      iid: 3
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        172445431
        10.1007/s40732-023-00546-0
      ppf: 339
      ppct: 23
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 1.4MB
      tig:
        atl: A Systematic Review of the Impact of Derived Relational Responding Technology in Raising Intelligence Scores.
      aug:
        au:
          Beck, Carmen
          Garcia, Yors
          Brothers, Lisa
          Mahoney, Amanda
          Rancourt, Raymond C.
          Andrews, Meredith
        affil:
          Applied Behavior Analysis Online Program, The Chicago School of Professional Psychology, 350 New Orleans, Suite 1050, Chicago, IL, USA
          https://ror.org/03etyjw28 Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia
          https://ror.org/05vt9qd57 Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
      su:
        Intelligence levels
        Intelligence tests
        Clearinghouses
      sug:
        subj:
          Intelligence levels
          Intelligence tests
          Financial Transactions Processing, Reserve, and Clearinghouse Activities
          Clearinghouses
      keyword:
        Intelligence
        PEAK
        Relational frame theory
        Relational reasoning
        SMART training
        Intelligence
        PEAK
        Relational frame theory
        Relational reasoning
        SMART training
      ab: The current review summarizes the literature on the impact of derived relational responding (DRR) technology on raising intelligence scores. We conducted a systematic review of peer-reviewed studies in PsycINFO, ERIC, and Web of Science between 1985 and 2021. Fourteen publications involving 15 experiments were identified. For studies meeting inclusion criteria, information was extracted on participant characteristics, design, settings, assessments conducted, intervention protocol and trained relations, mean intelligence quotient (IQ) scores before and after training, and outcomes. We assessed risk of bias using a revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB2), the Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I), and the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC). Overall, the results suggest that interventions using DRR procedures improve intelligence scores regardless of initial participant ability, diagnosis, or age level. Furthermore, eight of the reviewed studies used the Strengthening Mental Abilities with Relational Training (SMART), whereas two studies implemented the Promoting the Emergence of Advanced Knowledge (PEAK) protocol. Additional training procedures were identified, for example, multiple-exemplar training, fluency training, and relational flexibility training. The quality assessment showed high risk for seven randomized controlled trials, and low to moderate risk for five nonrandomized trials. Three studies used a type of single case design; one study meets standards according to the WWC protocol. The limitations and future directions are discussed.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N