An evidence-base for the implementation of hospital-based palliative care programs in routine cancer practice: A systematic review.

Background: Despite global support, there remain gaps in the integration of early palliative care into cancer care. The methods of implementation whereby evidence of benefits of palliative care is translated into practice deserve attention. Aim: To identify implementation frameworks utilised in inte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Palliative Medicine Vol. 37; no. 9; pp. 1326 - 1345
Autores principales: Rizvi, Farwa, Wilding, Helen Elizabeth, Rankin, Nicole M, Le Gautier, Roslyn, Gurren, Lorna, Sundararajan, Vijaya, Bellingham, Kylee, Chua, Joyce, Crawford, Gregory B, Nowak, Anna K, Le, Brian, Mitchell, Geoff, McLachlan, Sue-Anne, Sousa, Tanara Vieira, Hudson, Robyn, IJzerman, Maarten, Collins, Anna, Philip, Jennifer
Formato: research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Sage Publications Inc. Oct2023
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=172779536&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 172779536
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        02692163
        31I
      jtl: Palliative Medicine
      issn: 02692163
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2023
      vid: 37
      iid: 9
      pid: 344
      pub: Sage Publications Inc.
      place: Thousand Oaks, California
    artinfo:
      ui:
        172779536
        172779536
        172779536
        10.1177/02692163231186177
        172779536
      ppf: 1326
      ppct: 19
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: An evidence-base for the implementation of hospital-based palliative care programs in routine cancer practice: A systematic review.
      aug:
        au:
          Rizvi, Farwa
          Wilding, Helen Elizabeth
          Rankin, Nicole M
          Le Gautier, Roslyn
          Gurren, Lorna
          Sundararajan, Vijaya
          Bellingham, Kylee
          Chua, Joyce
          Crawford, Gregory B
          Nowak, Anna K
          Le, Brian
          Mitchell, Geoff
          McLachlan, Sue-Anne
          Sousa, Tanara Vieira
          Hudson, Robyn
          IJzerman, Maarten
          Collins, Anna
          Philip, Jennifer
        affil: Palliative Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
      sug:
        subj:
          Medical Practice, Evidence-Based
          Hospital Programs
          Program Implementation
          Conceptual Framework
          Palliative Care
          Oncologic Care
          Health Care Delivery, Integrated
          Health Services Accessibility
          Cancer Care Facilities
          Human
          Systematic Review
          Embase
          Psycinfo
          CINAHL Database
          Cochrane Library
          Medline
          Implementation Science
          Quality of Life
          Funding Source
      ab: Background: Despite global support, there remain gaps in the integration of early palliative care into cancer care. The methods of implementation whereby evidence of benefits of palliative care is translated into practice deserve attention. Aim: To identify implementation frameworks utilised in integrated palliative care in hospital-based oncology services and to describe the associated enablers and barriers to service integration. Design: Systematic review with a narrative synthesis including qualitative, mixed methods, pre-post and quasi experimental designs following the guidance by the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (PROSPERO registration CRD42021252092). Data sources: Six databases searched in 2021: EMBASE, EMCARE, APA PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and Ovid MEDLINE searched in 2023. Included were qualitative or quantitative studies, in English language, involving adults >18 years, and implementing hospital-based palliative care into cancer care. Critical appraisal tools were used to assess the quality and rigour. Results: Seven of the 16 studies explicitly cited the use of frameworks including those based on RE-AIM, Medical Research Council evaluation of complex interventions and WHO constructs of health service evaluation. Enablers included an existing supportive culture, clear introduction to the programme across services, adequate funding, human resources and identification of advocates. Barriers included a lack of communication with the patients, caregivers, physicians and palliative care team about programme goals, stigma around the term 'palliative', a lack of robust training, or awareness of guidelines and undefined staff roles. Conclusions: Implementation science frameworks provide a method to underpin programme development and evaluation as palliative care is integrated within the oncology setting.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        systematic review
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N