James 2:18-26: Diatribe or Dishonor.

James 2:18-26 has long been a troublesome passage for interpreters. Since James Hardy Ropes wrote his commentary in 1916, the majority of scholars have regarded it as an example of diatribe. Since, however, the interlocutor seems to agree with James, exegetes have had to propose a variety of interpr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Catholic Biblical Quarterly Vol. 85; no. 3; pp. 524 - 540
Autor principal: SWEENEY, MICHAEL L.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Catholic Biblical Association of America Jul2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=172784319&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 172784319
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00087912
        CBQ
      jtl: Catholic Biblical Quarterly
      issn: 00087912
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul2023
      vid: 85
      iid: 3
      pid: 1118
      pub: Catholic Biblical Association of America
    artinfo:
      ui:
        172784319
        10.1353/cbq.2023.a908784
      ppf: 524
      ppct: 16
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 2.8MB
      tig:
        atl: James 2:18-26: Diatribe or Dishonor.
      aug:
        au: SWEENEY, MICHAEL L.
      su:
        Hardy, James
        Motivation (Psychology)
        Philosophers
        Rhetoricians
        Judaism
      sug:
        subj:
          Hardy, James
          Motivation (Psychology)
          Philosophers
          Rhetoricians
          Judaism
      keyword:
        diatribe
        Greek rhetoric
        honor and shame
        paraenesis
      ab: James 2:18-26 has long been a troublesome passage for interpreters. Since James Hardy Ropes wrote his commentary in 1916, the majority of scholars have regarded it as an example of diatribe. Since, however, the interlocutor seems to agree with James, exegetes have had to propose a variety of interpretive maneuvers to make sense of the passage, each of which creates its own problems. I propose that we recon-sider how the verses function within the broader context. If we lay aside Ropes's view that this is an example of diatribe and regard it instead as a challenge to honor, the entire passage makes sense and flows neatly.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Catholic Biblical Quarterly is the property of Catholic Biblical Association of America and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Catholic Biblical Quarterly
      holder: Catholic Biblical Association of America
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2023
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N