Interventions to reduce falls in community‐dwelling adults with intellectual disability: a systematic review.

Background: People with intellectual disability have a high risk of falls and falls‐related injuries. Although people with intellectual disability are at increased risk of falls, there is a need to better understand the efficacy of interventions that can help reduce falls and address risk factors in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Intellectual Disability Research Vol. 67; no. 11; pp. 1073 - 1096
Autores principales: Lalor, A., Callaway, L., Koritsas, S., Curran‐Bennett, A., Wong, R., Zannier, R., Hill, K.
Formato: research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Nov2023
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=172804072&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 172804072
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09642633
        EUL
      jtl: Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
      issn: 09642633
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Nov2023
      vid: 67
      iid: 11
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        172804072
        172804072
        172804072
        10.1111/jir.13066
        172804072
      ppf: 1073
      ppct: 23
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Interventions to reduce falls in community‐dwelling adults with intellectual disability: a systematic review.
      aug:
        au:
          Lalor, A.
          Callaway, L.
          Koritsas, S.
          Curran‐Bennett, A.
          Wong, R.
          Zannier, R.
          Hill, K.
        affil: Rehabilitation Ageing and Independent Living (RAIL) Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne Victoria,, Australia
      sug:
        subj:
          Accidental Falls Prevention and Control
          Community Living In Old Age
          Intellectual Disability
          Health Services for Persons with Disabilities
          Human
          Male
          Female
          Adult
          Aged
          United States
          Systematic Review
          Medline
          Psycinfo
          CINAHL Database
          Cochrane Library
          Quality of Life
          Sample Size
          Risk Assessment
          Descriptive Statistics
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Background: People with intellectual disability have a high risk of falls and falls‐related injuries. Although people with intellectual disability are at increased risk of falls, there is a need to better understand the efficacy of interventions that can help reduce falls and address risk factors in this population. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the type, nature and effectiveness of interventions undertaken to reduce falls with community‐dwelling adults with intellectual disability and the quality of this evidence. Method: Four electronic databases were searched: Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL Plus and the Cochrane Library. Studies were included if they involved people aged 18 years or over, at least 50% of study participants had intellectual disability, participants were community‐dwelling, and the study evaluated any interventions aiming to reduce falls. Study quality was assessed using the National Institutes of Health study quality assessment tools. Reporting of the review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Results: Seven studies were eligible for review, with a total of 286 participants and mean age of 50.4 years. As only one randomised trial was identified, a narrative synthesis of results was undertaken. Five studies evaluated exercise interventions, one evaluated a falls clinic programme, and one evaluated stretch fabric splinting garments. Methodological quality varied (two studies rated as good, four as fair, and one as poor). Exercise interventions varied in terms of exercise type and dosage, frequency and intensity, and most did not align with recommendations for successful falls prevention exercise interventions reported for older people. While the majority of studies reported reduced falls, they differed in methods of reporting falls, and most did not utilise statistical analyses to evaluate outcomes. Conclusion: This review identified a small number of falls prevention intervention studies for people with intellectual disability. Although several studies reported improvements in fall outcomes, ability to draw conclusions about intervention effectiveness is limited by small sample sizes and few studies. Further large‐scale research is required to implement and evaluate falls prevention interventions specifically for adults with intellectual disability.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        systematic review
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N