The Governing of Opinions: Hobbes on How Civic Education and Censorship Impact Subjects' Deliberation.
Thomas Hobbes's most important recommendations for a sovereign reader concerned the governing of opinion. Due to the spread of false doctrines and their powerful champions, Hobbes was afraid that subjects would have opinions contrary to the maintenance of peace. His solution comprehended a combinati...
| Published in: | Disputatio: International Journal of Philosophy Vol. 14; no. 67; pp. 395 - 411 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Paradigm Publishing Services
Dec2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=172820658&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 172820658 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 0873626X 1CM2 jtl: Disputatio: International Journal of Philosophy issn: 0873626X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Dec2022 vid: 14 iid: 67 pid: 35924 pub: Paradigm Publishing Services artinfo: ui: 172820658 10.2478/disp-2022-0019 ppf: 395 ppct: 16 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 231KB tig: atl: The Governing of Opinions: Hobbes on How Civic Education and Censorship Impact Subjects' Deliberation. aug: au: Oliveira, Mariana Kuhn de affil: Brazilian Center for Analysis and Planning su: Civics education Censorship Doctrinal theology Obedience Peace Religion Religions sug: subj: Civics education Censorship Doctrinal theology Obedience Peace Religion Religions keyword: civil doctrine imprint obedience public instruction religion ab: Thomas Hobbes's most important recommendations for a sovereign reader concerned the governing of opinion. Due to the spread of false doctrines and their powerful champions, Hobbes was afraid that subjects would have opinions contrary to the maintenance of peace. His solution comprehended a combination of civic education and censorship. This text explains how Hobbes justifies his recommendations from the perspective of individual deliberation. It argues that Hobbes conceived censoring circulating doctrines as a way of keeping subjects' minds like clean paper, ready for the sovereign to imprint civil doctrine in them through teaching, thereby increasing the chances of influencing subjects' (free) deliberation, and thus of producing obedience. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Disputatio: International Journal of Philosophy is the property of Paradigm Publishing Services and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Disputatio: International Journal of Philosophy holder: Paradigm Publishing Services dt: @attributes: year: 2022 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|