Implementation strategies preferred by primary care clinicians to facilitate cancer prevention and control activities.

Key clinical and community members need to be involved in the identification of feasible and impactful implementation strategies for translation of evidence-based interventions into practice. While a wide range of implementation strategies has been developed, there is little research on their applic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Behavioral Medicine Vol. 46; no. 5; pp. 821 - 837
Autores principales: Glasgow, Russell E., Brtnikova, Michaela, Dickinson, L. Miriam, Carroll, Jennifer K., Studts, Jamie L.
Formato: forms research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Oct2023
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=172842166&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 172842166
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01607715
        JBM
      jtl: Journal of Behavioral Medicine
      issn: 01607715
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2023
      vid: 46
      iid: 5
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        172842166
        162965720
        172842166
        172842166
        10.1007/s10865-023-00400-2
        172842166
      ppf: 821
      ppct: 16
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Implementation strategies preferred by primary care clinicians to facilitate cancer prevention and control activities.
      aug:
        au:
          Glasgow, Russell E.
          Brtnikova, Michaela
          Dickinson, L. Miriam
          Carroll, Jennifer K.
          Studts, Jamie L.
        affil: Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 1844 Kona St. Eugene, OR 97403-2142, Aurora, CO, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Neoplasms Prevention and Control
          Primary Health Care
          Physicians, Family
          Professional Practice Methods
          Funding Source
          Human
          Convenience Sample
          Descriptive Statistics
          Data Analysis Software
          Surveys
          Counseling
          Cancer Screening
          Analysis of Variance
          Male
          Female
          Adolescence
          Young Adult
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Adolescent: 13-18 years
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Key clinical and community members need to be involved in the identification of feasible and impactful implementation strategies for translation of evidence-based interventions into practice. While a wide range of implementation strategies has been developed, there is little research on their applicability for cancer prevention and control (CPC) efforts in primary care. We conducted a survey of primary care physicians to identify implementation strategies they perceive as most feasible and impactful. The survey included both primary prevention behavior change counseling and cancer screening issues. Analyses contrasted ratings of feasibility and impact of nine implementation strategies, and among clinicians in different settings with a focus on comparisons between clinicians in rural vs. non-rural settings. We recruited a convenience sample of 326 respondents from a wide range of practice types from four practice-based research networks in 49 states and including 177 clinicians in rural settings. Ratings of impact were somewhat higher than those for feasibility. Few of the nine implementation strategies were high on both impact and feasibility. Only 'adapting to my practice' was rated higher than a 4 ("moderate") on both impact and feasibility. There were relatively few differences between rural and non-rural clinicians or associated with other clinician or setting characteristics. There is considerable variability in perceived impact and feasibility of implementation strategies for CPC activities among family medicine clinicians. It is important to assess both feasibility and impact of implementation strategies as well as their generalizability across settings. Our results suggest that optimal strategies to implement evidence-based CPC activities will likely need to be adapted for primary care settings. Future research is needed to replicate these findings and identify practical, implementation partner informed implementation strategies.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        forms
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N