Words matter: judges' value judgments in sentence pronouncements remarks.

This study examines judges' value judgments on their remarks during sentence pronouncements. We performed a content analysis of 93 sentence pronouncements from the 13 judges from a Portuguese criminal court. Within these discourses, 299 discourse units were codified as judges' value judgments, that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Crime, Law & Social Change Vol. 80; no. 4; pp. 455 - 478
Autores principales: de Castro Rodrigues, Andreia, Cunha, Olga S., de Oliveira, Jorge Q., Gonçalves, Rui A., Sacau-Fontenla, Ana
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Nov2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=172842792&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 172842792
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09254994
        CRG
      jtl: Crime, Law & Social Change
      issn: 09254994
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Nov2023
      vid: 80
      iid: 4
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        172842792
        10.1007/s10611-023-10097-8
      ppf: 455
      ppct: 23
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 714KB
      tig:
        atl: Words matter: judges' value judgments in sentence pronouncements remarks.
      aug:
        au:
          de Castro Rodrigues, Andreia
          Cunha, Olga S.
          de Oliveira, Jorge Q.
          Gonçalves, Rui A.
          Sacau-Fontenla, Ana
        affil:
          William James Center for Research & ISPA–Instituto Universitário, R. Jardim do Tabaco 34, 1100-304, Lisbon, Portugal
          Hei-Lab & School of Psychology and Life Sciences, Lusófona University, Porto, Portugal
          https://ror.org/043pwc612 School of Criminology, Faculty of Law, University of Porto, Rua dos Bragas, 223, 4050-123, Porto, Portugal
          https://ror.org/037wpkx04 School of Psychology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057, Braga, Portugal
          https://ror.org/037wpkx04 JUSGOV, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057, Braga, Portugal
          https://ror.org/04h8e7606 Faculty of Human and Social Sciences, University Fernando Pessoa, Praça 9 de Abril, 349, 4249-004, Porto, Portugal
      su:
        Judges
        Criminal courts
        Justice administration
        Content analysis
        Portuguese language
      sug:
        subj:
          Judges
          Criminal courts
          Justice administration
          Content analysis
          Courts
          Portuguese language
      keyword:
        Judges' training
        Judges' value judgements
        Judicial decision-making process
        Penal justice
        Qualitative methodology
        Sentence pronouncements
        Sentencing
        Judges' training
        Judges' value judgements
        Judicial decision-making process
        Penal justice
        Qualitative methodology
        Sentence pronouncements
        Sentencing
      ab: This study examines judges' value judgments on their remarks during sentence pronouncements. We performed a content analysis of 93 sentence pronouncements from the 13 judges from a Portuguese criminal court. Within these discourses, 299 discourse units were codified as judges' value judgments, that is, personal contents beyond strict legal issues. From these 299, 107 were recommendations (comprehending advice to change, to not reoffend, to rethink life, and action instructions), and 192 were opinions about the individual, the society, and the judicial system. The existence of value judgments in sentence pronouncements carries important implications for the sentencing process. Namely, these value judgments allow the identification of judges' personal ideas, and issues particularly vulnerable for simplistic reasonings, as well as subjective considerations. This identification and the discussion on the powerful role of language in the context of sentencing are key features to strengthen judges' training and, consequently, to improve the implementation of penal justice.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N