Andreas, Intertextuality, and Three Modes of Philology: Traditional, Oral, Digital.
This essay examines the intertextual relationships between Andreas and other Old English poems. One reason for the current lack of consensus about these relationships stems from the different philological paradigms—traditional, oral, and digital—that have been applied to the poem. The present study...
| Publicado en: | Neophilologus Vol. 107; no. 4; pp. 611 - 625 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Dec2023
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| Sumario: | This essay examines the intertextual relationships between Andreas and other Old English poems. One reason for the current lack of consensus about these relationships stems from the different philological paradigms—traditional, oral, and digital—that have been applied to the poem. The present study has three aims: to demonstrate that, appearances to the contrary, the different paradigms are compatible; to show that Andreas is more closely related to some poems than to others; and to describe how the findings of digital philology can be incorporated into the mainstream of critical discussions about Old English poetic intertextuality. |
|---|