Keeping Your Mouth Shut: Spiraling Self-Censorship in the United States.

Over the period from the heyday of McCarthyism to the present, the percentage of the American people not feeling free to express their views has tripled. In 2020, more than four in ten people engaged in self-censorship. Our analyses of over-time and cross-sectional variability suggest that, first, s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Political Science Quarterly (Oxford University Press / USA) Vol. 138; no. 3; pp. 361 - 377
Autores principales: Gibson, James L, Sutherland, Joseph L
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Oxford University Press / USA Fall2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=172855862&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 172855862
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00323195
        H6QN
      jtl: Political Science Quarterly (Oxford University Press / USA)
      issn: 00323195
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Fall2023
      vid: 138
      iid: 3
      pid: 622
      pub: Oxford University Press / USA
    artinfo:
      ui:
        172855862
        10.1093/psquar/qqad037
      ppf: 361
      ppct: 16
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 558KB
      tig:
        atl: Keeping Your Mouth Shut: Spiraling Self-Censorship in the United States.
      aug:
        au:
          Gibson, James L
          Sutherland, Joseph L
        affil:
          Department of Political Science, Washington University in St. Louis , Campus Box 1063, St. Louis, MO 63130-4899 , USA
          Department of Quantitative Theory & Methods, Emory University , 36 Eagle Row, 5th Floor, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
      su:
        Polarization (Social sciences)
        Civil rights
        Political correctness
        McCarthyism
        Self-censorship
        Conservatives
        Liberals
      sug:
        subj:
          Polarization (Social sciences)
          Civil rights
          Political correctness
          McCarthyism
          Self-censorship
          Conservatives
          Liberals
      keyword:
        cancel culture
        democratic deliberation
        political correctness
        political freedom
        political polarization
        cancel culture
        democratic deliberation
        political correctness
        political freedom
        political polarization
      ab: Over the period from the heyday of McCarthyism to the present, the percentage of the American people not feeling free to express their views has tripled. In 2020, more than four in ten people engaged in self-censorship. Our analyses of over-time and cross-sectional variability suggest that, first, self-censorship is connected to affective polarization among the mass public, with greater polarization associated with more self-censorship. Second, levels of mass opposition to full civil liberties bear no relationship to self-censorship. Third, those who perceive a more repressive government are slightly more likely to self-censor. Fourth, conservatives report engaging in more self-censorship than liberals (but this is not true when comparing Republicans with Democrats). Together, these findings suggest that one's larger macro-environment may have little to do with self-censorship. Instead, micro-environment sentiments, such as worrying that expressing unpopular views will isolate and alienate people from their friends, family, and neighbors, may be the driver of self-censorship.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N