An assessment of token value and effectiveness: A replication.
The purpose of the current study was to conduct a systematic replication of Fiske et al. (2015) to extend the behavior‐analytic literature on token reinforcement. Specifically, the researchers addressed several of the limitations of Fiske et al. by including specific conditioning procedures, creatin...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.) Vol. 56; no. 4; pp. 898 - 914 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Fall2023
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=172856033&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 172856033 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 00218855 NRNO jtl: Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.) issn: 00218855 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Fall2023 vid: 56 iid: 4 pid: 52269 pub: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. artinfo: ui: 172856033 172856033 172856033 10.1002/jaba.1011 172856033 ppf: 898 ppct: 16 formats: tig: atl: An assessment of token value and effectiveness: A replication. aug: au: Hangen, Marcella M. Romero, Ashley N. Norris, Halle M. Gorycki, Kathryn A. Roberts, Breanna R. Neidert, Pamela L. affil: Department of Disability and Psychoeducational Studies, University of Arizona, Tucson Arizona,, USA sug: subj: Children with Disabilities Psychosocial Factors Reward Reinforcement (Psychology) Evaluation Child Behavior Evaluation Task Performance and Analysis Human Replication Studies Comparative Studies Child Child: 6-12 years ab: The purpose of the current study was to conduct a systematic replication of Fiske et al. (2015) to extend the behavior‐analytic literature on token reinforcement. Specifically, the researchers addressed several of the limitations of Fiske et al. by including specific conditioning procedures, creating a controlled history of reinforcement with the token system, including participants with and without disabilities to extend the generality of the findings, and equating the magnitude of reinforcement across the primary and paired‐token conditions. The current study evaluated the reinforcing value of tokens by using progressive‐ratio schedules to compare the efficacy of primary reinforcement, paired tokens, and unpaired tokens. The results suggest that paired tokens may function as reinforcers, but they were not as consistently effective as primary reinforcers. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|