Longitudinal Grammaticality Judgments of Tense Marking in Complex Questions in Children With and Without Specific Language Impairment, Ages 5--18 Years.

Purpose: Identification of children with specific language impairment (SLI) can be difficult even though their language can lag that of age peers throughout childhood. A clinical grammar marker featuring tense marking in simple clauses is valid and reliable for young children but is limited by ceili...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research Vol. 66; no. 10; pp. 3882 - 3907
Autores principales: Rice, Mabel L., Earnest, Kathleen Kelsey, Hoffman, Lesa
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Oct2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=172861990&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 172861990
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10924388
        1SM
      jtl: Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research
      issn: 10924388
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2023
      vid: 66
      iid: 10
      pid: 42
      pub: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
    artinfo:
      ui:
        172861990
        10.1044/2023_JSLHR-22-00507
      ppf: 3882
      ppct: 25
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 1.9MB
      tig:
        atl: Longitudinal Grammaticality Judgments of Tense Marking in Complex Questions in Children With and Without Specific Language Impairment, Ages 5--18 Years.
      aug:
        au:
          Rice, Mabel L.
          Earnest, Kathleen Kelsey
          Hoffman, Lesa
        affil:
          Child Language Doctoral Program, University of Kansas, Lawrence
          Language Acquisition Studies Laboratory, University of Kansas, Lawrence
          College of Education, University of Iowa, Iowa City
      su:
        Kansas
        Judgment (Psychology)
        Linguistics
        Child development
        Comparative grammar
        Task performance
        Sex distribution
        Intellect
        Phonetics
        Education of mothers
        Confidence intervals
        Descriptive statistics
        Research funding
        Language disorders in children
        Longitudinal method
        Secondary analysis
      sug:
        subj:
          Judgment (Psychology)
          Linguistics
          Child development
          Comparative grammar
          Task performance
          Sex distribution
          Intellect
          Phonetics
          Kansas
          Education of mothers
          Confidence intervals
          Descriptive statistics
          Research funding
          Language disorders in children
          Longitudinal method
          Secondary analysis
      ab: Purpose: Identification of children with specific language impairment (SLI) can be difficult even though their language can lag that of age peers throughout childhood. A clinical grammar marker featuring tense marking in simple clauses is valid and reliable for young children but is limited by ceiling effects around the age of 8 years. This study evaluated a new, more grammatically challenging complex sentence task in children affected or unaffected with SLI in longitudinal data, ages 5--18 years. Method: Four hundred eighty-three children (213 unaffected, 270 affected) between 5 and 18 years of age participated, following a rolling recruitment longitudinal design encompassing a total of 4,148 observations. The new experimental grammaticality judgment task followed linguistic concepts of syntactic sites for finiteness and movement within complex clauses. Growth modeling methods evaluated group differences over time for four different outcomes; three were hypothesized to evaluate optional omissions of overt finiteness forms in authorized sentence sites, and one evaluated an overt error of tense marking. Results: As in earlier studies of younger children, growth models for the SLI group were consistently lower than the unaffected group, although the growth trajectories across groups did not differ. The results replicated across four item types defined by omissions with minor differences for an item with an overt error of tense marking. Covariates of child nonverbal IQ, mother's education, and child sex did not significantly moderate these effects. Conclusion: The outcomes support the task as having potential screening value for identification of children with SLI and are consistent with linguistic interpretations of task demands.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N